Students' Innovative Thinking and Their Perceptions About the Ideal Learning Environment

The goal of this study was twofold: to examine how undergraduate students’ perceive themselves as innovative thinkers and to examine the way they express innovative ideas when asked to illustrate the ideal learning environment. The research was conducted among undergraduate students in two higher education institutes (N = 202). The ‘mixed methods research’ model was employed in the analysis and interpretation of data that was collected by two research tools: the Innovative Thinking survey and the Reflective Drawings analysis. Findings indicated that most students perceived their innovative thinking as average. Two groups of students expressed the highest inclination to be innovative: young students and experts in ICTs, suggesting that innovative thinkers are most likely to become experts in the use of advanced technologies. The analysis of students’ drawings of the ‘ideal learning environment’, indicated that only few illustrated innovative scenarios. Findings showed that although most of the students made a shift from desktops to mobile computers, their drawings did not reflect the added value of ubiquity learning. This finding indicates that most of the students still adhere to traditional learning environments, and are not able to imagine learning in any other way.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[4]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[5]  Barbara Sianesi,et al.  The returns to education: a review of the empirical macro-economic literature , 2002 .

[6]  Miri Barak,et al.  Closing the Gap Between Attitudes and Perceptions About ICT-Enhanced Learning Among Pre-service STEM Teachers , 2014 .

[7]  P. Wessels,et al.  Generation Y students: Appropriate learning styles and teaching approaches in the economic and management sciences faculty , 2009 .

[8]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Inservice Science Teachers Via Embedded Assessment , 2009 .

[9]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[10]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures , 2008 .

[11]  Lily Orland-Barak,et al.  The expressed and the realized: Mentors’ representations of a mentoring conversation and its realization in practice , 2005 .

[12]  T. Downes,et al.  Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF): Building the ICT in education capacity of the next generation of teachers in Australia , 2012 .

[13]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[14]  Emanuel F. Hammer,et al.  The Clinical Application of Projective Drawings , 1958 .

[15]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  The innovator's DNA: mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators , 2011 .

[16]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Professional Identity Development of Teacher Candidates Participating in an Informal Science Education Internship: A focus on drawings as evidence , 2011 .

[17]  J. Piaget.  Science of education and the psychology of the child , 1970 .

[18]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[19]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Enhancing Undergraduate Students' Chemistry Understanding through Project-Based Learning in an IT Environment , 2005 .

[20]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Education , 1938 .

[21]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills , 2011 .

[22]  Gerald Biberman,et al.  Projective Drawings and Metaphor: Analysis of Organisational Culture , 1990 .

[23]  W. Hayes.  The Progressive Education Movement: Is It Still a Factor in Today's Schools? , 2006 .

[24]  Sandra Weber,et al.  Drawing ourselves into teaching: Studying the images that shape and distort teacher education , 1995 .

[25]  Athanassios Jimoyiannis,et al.  Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Vic Lally,et al.  Gender differences in an on-line learning environment , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  Boris Berenfeld,et al.  Global Lab: Harnessing the Cloud & Social Networking for K-12 Science Learning…Since 1991 , 2010 .