Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility

The present article examines effects of power on basic cognition. It proposes that power bolsters the ability to attend to information selectively; enhancing the processing of information that is related to accessible constructs in detriment of peripheral, less accessible information. In contrast, powerlessness increases attunement to peripheral information, inducing greater distractibility and less attentional flexibility. Experiment 1 focuses on attention to an object and its context. Experiment 2 examines attentional focus and readiness to act. Experiment 3 examines attention to global vs. local aspects of a focal target. Powerful individuals, relative to powerless individuals, showed greater ability to inhibit peripheral information, and greater ability to focus attention in line with the demands of the task. Furthermore, inhibiting peripheral information facilitated action. The consequences of these findings for different domains are discussed.

[1]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Group size, outcome dependency, and power. Effects on perceived and actual group variability. , 2004 .

[2]  A. Allport.  Attention and control: have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years , 1993 .

[3]  S. Yantis.  Control of visual attention. , 1998 .

[4]  S. Fiske,et al.  Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design , 2000 .

[5]  P. Gollwitzer.  The Volitional Benefits of Planning , 1996 .

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[7]  N. Liberman,et al.  Social Motivation: Motivation and Construct Accessibility , 2004 .

[8]  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001 .

[9]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[13]  R. Kimchi.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context , 1996 .

[16]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals , 2005 .

[17]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .

[18]  K. Lewin,et al.  Regression, Retrogression, and Development. , 1941 .

[19]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures , 2003, Psychological science.

[20]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  The self in social psychology. , 1999 .

[22]  G. Weary,et al.  Individual differences in causal uncertainty. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  P. Corr.  Perceived control, motivation, and coping: E. A. Skinner: London: Sage Publications (1995). Paperback: £15.50. ISBN 0-8039-5561-8; hardback: £34.95, ISBN 0-8039-5560-X, 214 pp , 1996 .

[24]  C. Judd,et al.  The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism , 2003 .

[25]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[26]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[27]  H. A. Witkin.  A Cognitive-Style Approach to Cross-Cultural Research , 1967 .

[28]  T. Goschke,et al.  Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. , 1993 .

[29]  S. Fiske,et al.  Minority status decreases sense of control and increases interpretive processing , 2006 .

[30]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  A Theory of Self-regulation: Action versus State Orientation, Self-discrimination, and Some Applications , 1992 .

[31]  C. Umilta,et al.  Dominance of global visual properties at birth. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  A. Guinote.  The perception of group variability in a non-minority and a minority context: when adaptation leads to out-group differentiation. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[33]  D. Broadbent.  The hidden preattentive processes. , 1977, The American psychologist.

[34]  D. Navon,et al.  Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  David Navon,et al.  The forest revisited: More on global precedence , 1981 .

[36]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks , 1990 .

[37]  S. Silverstein,et al.  Stimulus configuration and context effects in perceptual organization in schizophrenia. , 1996, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[38]  C Neil Macrae,et al.  Do I Know You? Processing Orientation and Face Recognition , 2002, Psychological science.

[39]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[40]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[41]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[42]  C. Scherbaum,et al.  Marginal and mindful: deviants in social interactions. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  B. Cornblatt,et al.  Distractibility in schizophrenia , 1995, Psychiatry Research.

[44]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Does the attentional state determine processing dominance in to-be-ignored compound stimuli? , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[46]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[47]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[48]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .

[49]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[50]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[51]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[53]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[54]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[56]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes , 2004 .

[59]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002 .

[61]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[62]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The Naive Misuse of Power: Nonconscious Sources of Sexual Harassment , 1995 .

[63]  M R Lamb,et al.  Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information? , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  S. Fiske,et al.  Outcome Dependency and Attention to Inconsistent Information , 1984 .

[65]  M. Hyland.  Control theory interpretation of psychological mechanisms of depression: comparison and integration of several theories. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  T. Pittman,et al.  Motivation and cognition: Control deprivation and the nature of subsequent information processing☆ , 1989 .

[67]  M. Zanna,et al.  Alcohol myopia and condom use: can alcohol intoxication be associated with more prudent behavior? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.