Depth Discrimination from Optic Flow

A simple scheme for deriving relative depth (time-to-collision, or TTC) from optic flow is developed in which the total flow is first sensed by unconnected motion (imperfect filter) sensors and then the rotational component is subtracted to yield the translational component. Only the latter component yields depth information. This scheme is contrasted with one where the TTC sensors respond only to the translational component at the initial registration of the flow (perfect filter sensors or looming detectors). The simple scheme predicts the results of three experiments on discrimination of TTC: discrimination thresholds are elevated if the objects withdraw from rather than approach the observer, thresholds are elevated if a rotational component is added to the flow, and the amount of threshold elevation resulting from the addition of a rotational component is reduced by prior adaptation to a pure rotational flow. These results confirm the simple model and disconfirm predictions based on the looming detector scheme.

[1]  J. Simpson,et al.  The accessory optic system and its relation to the vestibulocerebellum. , 1979, Progress in brain research.

[2]  J A Perrone,et al.  Anisotropic responses to motion toward and away from the eye , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  M A Georgeson,et al.  Apparent Foveofugal Drift of Counterphase Gratings , 1978, Perception.

[5]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[6]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  James E Cutting.  Perceiving and recovering structure from events , 1986, SIGGRAPH 1986.

[8]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[9]  S. McKee.  A local mechanism for differential velocity detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  M. Treisman.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[11]  Lee Dn,et al.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980 .

[12]  A. Remole.  PERCEPTION WITH AN EYE FOR MOTION , 1987 .

[13]  K. R. Llewellyn,et al.  Visual guidance of locomotion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Space, Form and Optical Deformations , 1985 .

[15]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perception of Movement and Correlation in Stroboscopically Presented Noise Patterns , 1985, Perception.

[16]  E. Matin.  Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  F. Campbell,et al.  Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  R W Cumming,et al.  The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[19]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual perception of changing size: The effect of object size , 1979, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Prazdny,et al.  On the information in optical flows , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[22]  H C Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The visual ambiguity of a moving plane , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  J. Gibson,et al.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[25]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.

[26]  J H Rieger,et al.  Processing differential image motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Human Vision Favors Centrifugal Motion , 1980, Perception.

[28]  D Regan,et al.  How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving? , 1982, Science.

[29]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[30]  D. N. Lee.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[32]  A. Pantle,et al.  Physiological Basis of Motion Perception , 1978 .