Improved definition of dynamic load allowance factor for highway bridges

The main objective of this paper is to study the dynamic load allowance (DLA) calculation methods for bridges according to the dynamic response curve. A simply-supported concrete bridge with a smooth road surface was taken as an example. A half-vehicle model was employed to calculate the dynamic response of deflection and bending moment in the mid-span section under different vehicle speeds using the vehicle-bridge coupling method. Firstly, DLAs from the conventional methods and code provisions were analyzed and critically evaluated. Then, two improved computing approaches for DLA were proposed. In the first approach, the maximum dynamic response and its corresponding static response or its corresponding minimum response were selected to calculate DLA. The second approach utilized weighted average method to take account of multi-local DLAs. Finally, the DLAs from two approaches were compared with those from other methods. The results show that DLAs obtained from the proposed approaches are greater than those from the conventional methods, which indicate that the current conventional methods underestimate the dynamic response of the structure. The authors recommend that the weighted average method based on experiments be used to compute DLAs because it can reflect the vehicle’s whole impact on the bridge.

[1]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  IMPACT FORMULAS FOR VEHICLES MOVING OVER SIMPLE AND CONTINUOUS BEAMS. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE , 1995 .

[2]  Cheolwoo Park,et al.  Impact factors of bridges based on natural frequency for various superstructure types , 2013 .

[3]  Dongzhou Huang,et al.  Impact Factors for Simple-Span Highway Girder Bridges , 1995 .

[4]  Omar Chaallal,et al.  Bridge dynamics and dynamic amplification factors — a review of analytical and experimental findings , 1992 .

[5]  J. R. Billing,et al.  Dynamic loading and testing of bridges in Ontario , 1984 .

[6]  R. Lalthlamuana,et al.  Effect of vehicle flexibility on the vibratory response of bridge , 2014 .

[7]  Damian Beben,et al.  Dynamic amplification factors of corrugated steel plate culverts , 2013 .

[8]  Fei Yang,et al.  Wind-vehicle-bridge coupled vibration analysis based on random traffic flow simulation , 2014 .

[9]  Jerome F. Hajjar,et al.  Measured behavior of a curved composite I-girder bridge , 2010 .

[10]  R Shepherd,et al.  IMPACT FACTORS FOR SIMPLE CONCRETE BRIDGES , 1973 .

[11]  Ainars Paeglitis,et al.  The Dynamic Amplification Factor of the Bridges in Latvia , 2013 .

[12]  Lu Deng,et al.  Identification of Dynamic Vehicular Axle Loads: Theory and Simulations , 2010 .

[13]  Tae Ju Chung,et al.  Influence of road surface roughness on dynamic impact factor of bridge by full-scale dynamic testing , 2005 .

[14]  D I McLean,et al.  DYNAMIC IMPACT FACTORS FOR BRIDGES , 1998 .

[15]  Yail J. Kim,et al.  Recent Advances in Performance Evaluation and Flexural Response of Existing Bridges , 2009 .

[16]  David W Goodpasture,et al.  Influence of Bridge Approach, Surface Condition, and Velocity on Impact Factors for Fatigue-Prone Details , 1998 .

[17]  Mark F. Green Discussion: Bridge dynamics and dynamic amplification factors — a review of analytical and experimental findings , 1993 .

[18]  M. A. Sahin,et al.  METHODOLOGY FOR IMPACT FACTOR OF HORIZONTALLY CURVED BOX BRIDGES , 1993 .

[19]  Ton-Lo Wang,et al.  Impact Analysis of Continuous Multigirder Bridges due to Moving Vehicles , 1992 .

[20]  John B. Kennedy,et al.  Evaluation of impact factors for composite concrete–steel cellular straight bridges , 2003 .

[21]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  A drive-by inspection system via vehicle moving force identification , 2014 .

[22]  Xin Jiang,et al.  Effect of Shear Stud Connections on Dynamic Response of an FRP Deck Bridge under Moving Loads , 2013 .