Multi-stage optimal PMU placement including substation infrastructure

Phaser measurement units (PMUs) significantly benefit the operation and control of power systems. They offer precise phaser measurements with a high refresh rate. These measurements are utilized for wide area measurement system (WAMS) to improve situational awareness and enhance the control infrastructure. In spite of these advantages, the industry has been slow to adopt PMU technology, largely due to the cost of PMUs and the communication infrastructure. However, judicious selection of PMU locations, through optimal placement of PMUs (OPP) enables the minimization of installation cost. There have been several approaches to solve the OPP; most of these approaches assume that the minimum number of PMUs achieves the minimum cost or consider the cost of PMUs without considering the communication infrastructure. This paper presents an OPP approach that considers both the communication infrastructure and the installation cost of PMUs. The proposed approach uses multi-stage installation where each stage is dependent on the cost set by the utility and not the number of PMUs. Higher priority buses can be chosen under the proposed approach. An opposition-based elitist binary genetic algorithm (O-BEBGA) is used to solve the OPP. The proposed approach is tested on the IEEE 14-bus, IEEE RTS and IEEE 30-bus test systems.

[1]  Shahryar Rahnamayan,et al.  Opposition versus randomness in soft computing techniques , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  George J. Anders,et al.  Reliability-based phasor measurement unit placement in power systems considering transmission line outages and channel limits , 2014 .

[3]  F Aminifar,et al.  Probabilistic Multistage PMU Placement in Electric Power Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[4]  Masoud Esmaili,et al.  Voltage Stability-Constrained Optimal Simultaneous Placement of PMUs and Channels Enhancing Measurement Reliability and Redundancy , 2017, IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal.

[5]  B. Gou,et al.  Generalized Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimal PMU Placement , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Parimal Acharjee,et al.  Multiple Solutions of Optimal PMU Placement Using Exponential Binary PSO Algorithm for Smart Grid Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[7]  Jin Xu,et al.  Optimal Multistage PMU Placement for Wide-Area Monitoring , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  B. Gou,et al.  Unified PMU Placement for Observability and Bad Data Detection in State Estimation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Bikash C. Pal,et al.  Decentralized Dynamic State Estimation in Power Systems Using Unscented Transformation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  S.A. Soman,et al.  Optimal Multistage Scheduling of PMU Placement: An ILP Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  Andre Albuquerque,et al.  An estimation fusion method for including phasor measurements into power system real-time modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  S. C. Srivastava,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making approach for multistage optimal placement of phasor measurement units , 2011 .

[13]  Rahmat-Allah Hooshmand,et al.  A New Approach for Optimal Placement of PMUs and Their Required Communication Infrastructure in Order to Minimize the Cost of the WAMS , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  S. S. Ravi,et al.  A PMU Placement Scheme Considering Realistic Costs and Modern Trends in Relaying , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Lei Huang,et al.  Optimal PMU Placement Considering Controlled Islanding of Power System , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  F. Lin,et al.  Reliability-Based Incremental PMU Placement , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  E. Kyriakides,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units for Power System Observability , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Jamshid Aghaei,et al.  Probabilistic PMU Placement in Electric Power Networks: An MILP-Based Multiobjective Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[19]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Realistic Approach for Phasor Measurement Unit Placement: Consideration of Practical Hidden Costs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[20]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Contingency-Constrained PMU Placement in Power Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  D. Thukaram,et al.  Approach for Multistage Placement of Phasor Measurement Units Based on Stability Criteria , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Carmen Mas Machuca,et al.  Cost vs. reliability performance study of fiber access network architectures , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[23]  Francis Zane,et al.  The economics of fiber to the home revisited , 2003, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[24]  Vassilis Kekatos,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units via Convex Relaxation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  Babak Mozafari,et al.  Optimal placement of PMUs to maintain network observability using a modified BPSO algorithm , 2011 .

[26]  James S. Thorp,et al.  A PMU Placement Scheme Ensuring Real-Time Monitoring of Critical Buses of the Network , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[27]  M.M.A. Salama,et al.  Opposition-Based Differential Evolution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[28]  Li Ke-qiang Multi-source Shortest Distances Algorithm Based on Road Network Hierarchical Strategy , 2008 .

[29]  Joydeep Mitra,et al.  Opposition-based elitist real genetic algorithm for optimal power flow , 2016, 2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[30]  P. S. Georgilakis,et al.  Taxonomy of PMU Placement Methodologies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  Kai Sun,et al.  Optimal PMU placement for power system dynamic state estimation by using empirical observability Gramian , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[32]  Ali Abur,et al.  A Fast Decoupled State Estimator for Systems Measured by PMUs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[33]  Peter W. Eklund,et al.  A dynamic multi-source Dijkstra's algorithm for vehicle routing , 1996, 1996 Australian New Zealand Conference on Intelligent Information Systems. Proceedings. ANZIIS 96.