Classification improvement of P300 response based auditory spatial speller brain-computer interface paradigm

The aim of the presented study is to provide a comprehensive test of the EEG evoked response potential (ERP) feature selection techniques for the spatial auditory BCI-speller paradigm, which creates a novel communication option for paralyzed subjects or body-able individuals requiring a direct brain-computer interfacing application. For rigor, the study is conducted with 16 BCI-naive healthy subjects in an experimental setup based on five Japanese hiragana characters in an offline processing mode. In our previous studies the spatial auditory stimuli related P300 responses resulted with encouragingly separable target vs. non-target latencies in averaged responses, yet that finding was not well reproduced in the online BCI single trial based settings. We present the case study indicating that the auditory spatial unimodal paradigm classification accuracy can be enhanced with an AUC based feature selection approach, as far as BCI-naive healthy subjects are concerned.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  B. Blankertz,et al.  A New Auditory Multi-Class Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm: Spatial Hearing as an Informative Cue , 2010, PloS one.

[3]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Comparison of P300 Responses in Auditory, Visual and Audiovisual Spatial Speller BCI Paradigms , 2013, ArXiv.

[4]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball brain–computer interface for binary choices , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Valer Jurcak,et al.  10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  Ville Pulkki,et al.  Virtual Sound Source Positioning Using Vector Base Amplitude Panning , 1997 .

[7]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[8]  Peter Desain,et al.  Introducing the tactile speller: an ERP-based brain–computer interface for communication , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Jonathan R. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–Computer InterfacesPrinciples and Practice , 2012 .

[10]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A Practical Guide to Brain–Computer Interfacing with BCI2000: General-Purpose Software for Brain-Computer Interface Research, Data Acquisition, Stimulus Presentation, and Brain Monitoring , 2010 .

[11]  Shoji Makino,et al.  Psychophysical responses comparison in spatial visual, audiovisual, and auditory BCI-spelling paradigms , 2012, The 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems, and The 13th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligence Systems.

[12]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice , 2012 .