Incident and near miss reporting is one of the proactive tools of safety management. By analyzing incidents and near misses and by corrective actions, severe accidents can potentially be avoided. Near miss and incident reporting is widely used in many risk prone industries such as aviation or chemical industry. In shipping incident and near miss reporting is required by the mandatory safety management system International Safety Management Code (ISM Code). However, in several studies the conclusion has been that incidents are reported poorly in the shipping industry. The aim of this report is to highlight the best practices for incident reporting in shipping and to support the shipping industry in the better utilization of incident reporting information. The study consists of three parts: 1) voluntary, shared reporting systems in shipping (international experiences), 2) interview study at four shipping companies in Sweden and in Finland (best practices), 3) expert workshop on incident reporting (problems and solutions). Preconditions for a functional reporting system are an existing no blame culture, commitment of the top management, feedback, good communication, training and an easy-to-use system. Although preconditions are met, problems can still appear, for example due to psychological, interpersonal or nationality-related reasons. In order to keep the reporting system functioning, the shipping company must be committed to maintain and develop the system and to tackle the problems. The whole reporting process from compiling, handling and analyzing a report, creating corrective actions and implementing them has to be handled properly in order to gain benefits from the reporting system. In addition to avoiding accidents, the functional reporting system can also offer other benefits by increasing safety awareness, by improving the overall safety and working conditions on board, by enhancing team work and communication on board and between ships and the land-based organization of shipping companies. Voluntary shared reporting systems are supported in the shipping industry in principle, but their development in the Baltic Sea is still in its infancy and the potential benefits of sharing the reports have not been realized. On the basis of this study we recommend that a common reporting system be developed for the Baltic Sea area which all the ships operating in the area could use regardless of their flag. Such a wider system could prevent some of the problems related to the current national systems. There would be more incident cases available in the database and this would support anonymity and thus encourage shipping companies to report to a shared database more frequently. A shared reporting system would contribute to the sharing of experiences and to the wider use of incident information in the shipping industry.
[1]
Kaija Leena Saarela,et al.
Fatal and non-fatal occupational accidents: identical versus differential causation
,
1992
.
[2]
Sven Ove Hansson,et al.
Learning from accidents : what more do we need to know?
,
2010
.
[3]
Ulla Tapaninen,et al.
Incident reporting in Finnish shipping companies
,
2011
.
[4]
J. Lappalainen,et al.
Safety Culture and Maritime Personnel’s Safety Attitudes: Interview Report
,
2009
.
[5]
Syamantak Bhattacharya,et al.
The impact of the ISM code on the management of occupational health and safety in the maritime industry
,
2009
.
[6]
F. Knudsen.
Paperwork at the Service of Safety? Workers' Reluctance Against Written Procedures Exemplified by the Concept of 'Seamanship'
,
2009
.
[7]
Kent J Nielsen,et al.
The prevention of occupational injuries in two industrial plants using an incident reporting scheme.
,
2006,
Journal of safety research.
[8]
J. Lappalainen,et al.
Utilization of Incident Reporting in The Finnish Maritime Industry
,
2010
.
[9]
Johan M. Sanne,et al.
Incident reporting or storytelling? Competing schemes in a safety-critical and hazardous work setting
,
2008
.
[10]
Simon Jones,et al.
The importance of near miss reporting to further improve safety performance
,
1999
.
[11]
W. Kröger,et al.
Recommendations
,
1915,
Nature.
[12]
David O'Hare,et al.
Brief Encounters: Enhancing the Impact of Accident and Incident Occurrence Reports
,
2008
.
[13]
Marian Petre,et al.
A gentle guide to research methods
,
2006
.
[14]
Scott Scullion,et al.
Key figures
,
1969,
Making All Black Lives Matter.
[15]
Emery R. Hayhurst,et al.
Industrial Accident Prevention, A Scientific Approach
,
1932
.
[16]
L Lisette Kanse,et al.
Biases in incident reporting databases: An empirical study in the chemical process industry
,
2004
.
[17]
Åsa Ek *,et al.
Safety culture on board six Swedish passenger ships
,
2005
.