Design Limitations of Deployable Wings for Small Low Altitude UAVs

Deployable wing technology can offer many benefits to specific UAV missions, most importantly low-volume storage of the wings when the vehicle is not in-flight. Deployable wing designs enable aircraft to be more effective by providing larger numbers in volume restricted applications, such as air, submarine, or hand launches. As platforms become smaller, new avenues for deployable wings arise. This paper discusses issues related to deployable wing technology for small UAVs and some of the limitations for certain designs. In particular, the differences between rigid and inflatable solutions are discussed and example applications are presented. Like morphing aircraft technology, there is not a single solution for aircraft requiring deployable wings. The suitability of low-volume storage on an aircraft will be dependent on weight, span, storage requirements, and the flight envelope.

[1]  Rolf H. Luchsinger,et al.  An inflatable wing using the principle of Tensairity , 2007 .

[2]  Glen Brown,et al.  INFLATABLE STRUCTURES FOR DEPLOYABLE WINGS , 2001 .

[3]  Steven D. Landon Development of Deployable Wings for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Compliant Mechanisms , 2007 .

[4]  James E. Murray,et al.  Piloted simulation study of a balloon-assisted deployment of an aircraft at high altitude , 1992 .

[5]  John A. Main,et al.  Beam-Type Bending of Space-Based Inflated Membrane Structures , 1995 .

[6]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Design and Wind-Tunnel Analysis of a Fully Adaptive Aircraft Configuration , 2004 .

[7]  Charles J. Berthe,et al.  Longitudinal stability of the Goodyear Inflatoplane , 1964 .

[8]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Modeling and Optimization for Morphing Wing Concept Generation , 2007 .

[9]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  Multi-Disciplinary Multi-University Design of a High- Altitude Inflatable-Wing Aircraft with Systems Engineering for Aerospace Workforce Development , 2008 .

[10]  David Graziosi,et al.  Inflatable and Rigidizable Wing Components for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2003 .

[11]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Aeroelastic response of multi-segmented hinged wings , 2001 .

[12]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  In Flight Aspect Ratio Morphing Using Inflatable Wings , 2008 .

[13]  R. L. Comer,et al.  Deflections of AN Inflated Circular-Cylindrical Cantilever Beam , 1963 .

[14]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Flexible-wing-based Micro Air Vehicles , 2002 .

[15]  Weng Kheong Loh,et al.  Deployment dynamics of inflatable wings , 2008 .

[16]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Morphing Aircraft Technology - New Shapes for Aircraft Design , 2006 .

[17]  J. Jacob,et al.  Design of HALE Aircraft Using Inflatable Wings , 2008 .

[18]  John A. Main,et al.  Load‐Deflection Behavior of Space‐Based Inflatable Fabric Beams , 1994 .

[19]  R. Lind,et al.  Modeling and control of micro air vehicles with biologically-inspired morphing , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[20]  Christopher Bovais,et al.  Flight testing the Flying Radar Target (FLYRT) , 1994 .

[21]  S. L. Veldman Design and Analysis Methodologies for Inflated Beams , 2005 .

[22]  Torrey Owen Radcliffe,et al.  Aeroelastic study of a multi-hinged wing , 2003 .

[23]  Armando R. Rodriguez Morphing Aircraft Technology Survey , 2007 .

[24]  Anthony J. Colozza,et al.  Atmospheric Flight on Venus , 2002 .

[25]  Peter Ifju,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPOSITE BENDABLE-WING MICRO AIR VEHICLE , 2007 .

[26]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[27]  Stephen C. Smith,et al.  The Design of the Canyon Flyer, An Airplane for Mars Exploration , 2000 .

[28]  Ralph D. Kimberlin,et al.  Flight testing of fixed-wing aircraft , 2003 .

[29]  James E. Murray,et al.  Ground and Flight Evaluation of a Small-Scale Inflatable-Winged Aircraft , 2002 .