Evaluation of PV and QV based Voltage Stability Analyses in Converter Dominated Power Systems

PV and QV analyses have been widely used in industry. It has already been proven that these steady state methods can be used to assess power system's load ability from voltage stability perspective and that their use in terms of accuracy is justified when compared to time domain simulations. However, this prior validation was carried out for conventional synchronous generator dominated power systems. With increasing levels of power electronics interfaced generation (PEIG) being integrated in power systems, the accuracy of the PV and QV methods for these ‘green’ power systems can be challenged. This paper investigates to what extend the use of these methods is justified when the power system faces a displacement of conventional generation with PEIG. To this end, assessments with the IEEE 9 bus system and full converter wind turbine generators have been performed in this study. It is shown that, when compared to time domain simulations, the traditional PV and QV analyses do not always accurately predict the saddle-node bifurcation point. Steady state PV analyses show inaccuracies between 1.8% and 16.8% (when compared to time domain simulations) in identification of the instability point. The mismatch between steady state and time domain QV analyses is between 6.1% and 22.9%. Based on the achieved results, QV analysis is shown to be typically less accurate than PV analysis for PEIG rich systems.

[1]  A. C. Zambroni de Souza,et al.  QV and PV curves as a planning tool of analysis , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT).

[2]  P. Kundur,et al.  Voltage stability analysis using static and dynamic approaches , 1993 .

[3]  Amin Khodabakhshian,et al.  A comprehensive review of the voltage stability indices , 2016 .

[4]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  Optimal Placement of Unified Power Flow Controllers to Improve Dynamic Voltage Stability Using Power System Variable Based Voltage Stability Indices , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  Bin Wu,et al.  High-power wind energy conversion systems: State-of-the-art and emerging technologies , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Effects of Increasing Power Electronics based Technology on Power System Stability: Performance and Operations , 2020 .

[7]  H. H. Happ,et al.  Power System Control and Stability , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Badrul H. Chowdhury,et al.  Voltage stability analysis: V-Q power flow simulation versus dynamic simulation , 2000 .

[9]  C. Reis,et al.  A comparison of voltage stability indices , 2006, MELECON 2006 - 2006 IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference.

[10]  Diogo Marujo,et al.  On Control Actions Effects by Using ${\rm QV}$ Curves , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  R. B. Prada,et al.  Distributed generation: Voltage stability analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference.

[12]  F. A. Althowibi,et al.  Power System Voltage Stability: Indications,Allocations and Voltage Collapse Predictions , 2013 .

[13]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Comparison of line voltage stability indices using dynamic real time simulation , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[14]  A. Bianco,et al.  Voltage stability assessment for real-time operation , 2002 .

[15]  P. Kundur,et al.  Definition and classification of power system stability IEEE/CIGRE joint task force on stability terms and definitions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Erhab Youssef,et al.  Comparative study of voltage stability analysis for renewable energy grid-connected systems using PSS/E , 2015, SoutheastCon 2015.

[17]  Tarek Medalel Masaud,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of voltage stability indices in the presence of distributed generation , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech).