Vegetation dynamics in an experimentally fragmented landscape

In spatially heterogeneous habitats, plant community change may reflect spatially localized population-level processes that are sensitive to the size of an average habitat patch. However, local species turnover can also be determined by initial conditions and large-scale processes, in which case patch size effects may be overridden. To examine the role of patch size in directing secondary succession, we subdivided a newly abandoned agricultural field into an array of experimental patches (32, 288, and 5000 m2, grouped to sample equivalent portions of the field), and have thereafter censused the resident plant and animal communities at regular intervals. Here we report results from the first 6 yr of studies on the changing vascular plant community in an experimentally fragmented land- scape. The general course of change in all patches followed a trajectory typical of old-field succession, toward increasing dominance by longer lived and larger plant species. The same group of species that dominated at the start of the study continued to dominate after 6 yr, although in very different proportional abundances. Larger patches were more species rich than their smaller counterparts, and had a higher proportion of nonshared species, but the additional species were transient and low in abundance. Spatial heterogeneity in vegetation, measured as local community dissimilarity, increased in all patches but to a lesser extent in the largest patches, where censuses of nearby permanent quadrats indicated less diver- gence over time. At a population level, the strongest effect of patch size was that local populations of clonal species were more prone to disappear from the smallest patches. Nevertheless, summary measures of temporal community change did not reflect significant differences in localized species turnover. We conclude that patch size does not markedly affect the rate or pattern of early secondary succession, at the scales imposed in our experiment.

[1]  C. Margules,et al.  Constrasting Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on the Scorpion Cercophonius Squama and an Amphipod , 1994 .

[2]  J. E. Pinder,et al.  Limited invasion and reproduction of loblolly pines in a large South Carolina old field , 1994 .

[3]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  Plant succession : theory and prediction , 1993 .

[4]  G. Guntenspergen,et al.  Ecological benefits of the conservation reserve program , 1993 .

[5]  R D Holt,et al.  Diverse and Contrasting Effects of Habitat Fragmentation , 1992, Science.

[6]  R. Holt A neglected facet of island biogeography: The role of internal spatial dynamics in area effects , 1992 .

[7]  V. D. Valk,et al.  Establishment, colonization and persistence , 1992 .

[8]  T. Czárán,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  V. Brown,et al.  Grazing and Vegetation Change: Deflected or Modified Succession? , 1992 .

[10]  Philip H. Crowley,et al.  RESAMPLING METHODS FOR COMPUTATION-INTENSIVE DATA ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1992 .

[11]  M. Andersen Mechanistic Models for the Seed Shadows of Wind-Dispersed Plants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[12]  D. Phillips,et al.  Patch-size effects on early succession in southern Appalachian forests. , 1990 .

[13]  F. Bazzaz Plant-plant interactions in successional environments. , 1990 .

[14]  T. Farrell Succession in a rocky intertidal community; the importance of disturbance size and position within a disturbed patch , 1989 .

[15]  D. Greene,et al.  A MODEL OF WIND DISPERSAL OF WINGED OR PLUMED SEEDS , 1989 .

[16]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. , 1988 .

[17]  V. Brown,et al.  Effects of insect herbivory on early plant succession: comparison of an English site and an American site , 1988 .

[18]  David Tilman,et al.  CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE OF OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITIES ALONG EXPERIMENTAL NITROGEN GRADIENTS' , 1988 .

[19]  V. Brown,et al.  Some ecological characteristics of the primary trophic level of a secondary succession , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[21]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[22]  David Tilman,et al.  Secondary Succession and the Pattern of Plant Dominance Along Experimental Nitrogen Gradients , 1987 .

[23]  D. Tilman,et al.  Old‐Field Succession on a Minnesota Sand Plain , 1987 .

[24]  Brown Vk,et al.  Secondary succession: patterns and strategies. , 1987 .

[25]  I. M. Johnstone,et al.  PLANT INVASION WINDOWS: A TIME‐BASED CLASSIFICATION OF INVASION POTENTIAL , 1986 .

[26]  P. Marks,et al.  Succession after elimination of buried seeds from a recently plowed field , 1985 .

[27]  L. Kok,et al.  Dispersal of Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) Seeds , 1984, Weed Science.

[28]  M. Harmon,et al.  Early Plant Succession on the Muddy River Mudflow, Mount St. Helens, Washington , 1983 .

[29]  P. Werner,et al.  The pattern of tree seedling establishment relative to staghorn sumac cover in Michigan old fields , 1982 .

[30]  E. Leigh,et al.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal Landscapes: Disturbance and the Dynamics of Pattern , 1981 .

[32]  Immigration rates of plants species in three Dutch polders , 1979 .

[33]  J. Macmahon Ecosystems over time: Succession and other types of change , 1979 .

[34]  W. Platt,et al.  Resource Partitioning and Competition within a Guild of Fugitive Prairie Plants , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[35]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[36]  G. A. Yarranton,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a primary succession: nucleation , 1974 .

[37]  A. Kuchler A New Vegetation Map of Kansas , 1974 .

[38]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[39]  F. M. Burrows,et al.  CALCULATION OF THE PRIMARY TRAJECTORIES OF PLUMED SEEDS IN STEADY WINDS WITH VARIABLE CONVECTION , 1973 .

[40]  N S Goel,et al.  On the extinction of a colonizing species. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[42]  F. Golley Structure and Function of an Old‐Field Broomsedge Community , 1965 .

[43]  F. W. Preston The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I , 1962 .

[44]  L. Milne,et al.  The Balance of Nature , 1953, Oryx.

[45]  G. E. Bard Secondary Succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey , 1952 .

[46]  D. Goodall,et al.  Some considerations in the use of point quadrats for the analysis of vegetation. , 1952, Australian journal of scientific research. Ser. B: Biological sciences.