Effect of EO and PO positions in nonionic surfactants on surfactant properties and demulsification performance

Abstract Demulsifiers provide an important means of breaking water-in-oil emulsions that occur in industrial processes. The properties and the performance of 20 blocked copolymers from four surfactant families were investigated and three pairs isomeric compounds were compared. The results show that different positions of the ethylene oxide (EO) and propylene oxide (PO) in block copolymers lead to different hydrophile–lipophile balances (HLB) of surfactant. The sequential block copolymer is more hydrophilic than the reverse-sequential one with similar chemical composition. The greater the molecular weight, the greater the difference between the hydrophile–lipophile balances of the two surfactant types. Generally, the demulsification performance of sequential copolymers is better than that of reverse-sequential copolymers. Position isomerism of the surfactant affects demulsification performance by changing the hydrophile–lipophile balance, interfacial properties, and steric characteristics at the interface.

[1]  W. C. Griffin.  Calculation of HLB values of non-ionic surfactants , 1954 .

[2]  Kenneth J. Lissant,et al.  Demulsification : industrial applications , 1983 .

[3]  T. Dąbroś,et al.  Effect of Demulsifier Properties on Destabilization of Water-in-Oil Emulsion , 2003 .

[4]  J. Sjöblom,et al.  Chemical destabilization of crude oil based emulsions and asphaltene stabilized emulsions , 2001 .

[5]  P. Luckham,et al.  Dewatering of crude oil emulsions 3. Emulsion resolution by chemical means , 1994 .

[6]  M. Kahlweit.  The phase behavior of systems of the type H2O-oil—nonionic surfactant—electrolyte , 1982 .

[7]  K. Shinoda,et al.  The solubilization of hydrocarbons in aqueous solutions of nonionic surfactants , 1967 .

[8]  Martin J. Schick,et al.  Nonionic Surfactants: Physical Chemistry , 1987 .

[9]  D. Cooper,et al.  The relevance of “HLB” to de‐emulsification of a mixture of heavy oil, water and clay , 1980 .

[10]  H. Kunieda,et al.  Critical Phenomena in a Surfactant/Water/Oil System. Basic Study on the Correlation between Solubilization, Microemulsion, and Ultralow Interfacial Tensions , 1981 .

[11]  A. K. Malhotra,et al.  Emulsion stability: an analysis of the effects of bulk and interfacial properties on film mobility and drainage rate , 1983 .

[12]  T. Dąbroś,et al.  Development of a method for measurement of relative solubility of nonionic surfactants , 2004 .

[13]  T. Ogawa,et al.  The solubilization of water in nonaqueous solutions of nonionic surfactants , 1967 .

[14]  N. E. Maysour,et al.  Polyoxyalkylenated amines for breaking water‐in‐oil emulsions: effect of structural variations on the demulsification efficiency , 1998 .

[15]  P. Luckham,et al.  Dewatering of crude oil emulsions 2. Interfacial properties of the asphaltic constituents of crude oil , 1993 .

[16]  Darsh T. Wasan,et al.  Effect of demulsifier partitioning on the destabilization of water-in-oil emulsions , 1996 .

[17]  A. Nikolov,et al.  DEMULSIFICATION OF WATER IN OIL EMULSIONS USING WATER SOLUBLE DEMULSIFIERS , 1992 .

[18]  Darsh T. Wasan,et al.  Chemical demulsification of petroleum emulsions using oil-soluble demulsifiers , 1991 .