Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation

Abstract The imitation paradigm ( Goldinger, 1998 ) has shown that speakers shift their production phonetically in the direction of the imitated speech, indicating the use of episodic traces in speech perception. Although word-level specificity of imitation has been shown, it is unknown whether imitation also can take place with sub-lexical units. By using a modified imitation paradigm, the current study investigated: (1) the generalizability of phonetic imitation at phoneme and sub-phonemic levels, (2) word-level specificity through acoustic measurements of speech production; and (3) automaticity of phonetic imitation and its sensitivity to linguistic structure. The sub-phonemic feature manipulated in the experiments was VOT on the phoneme /p/. The results revealed that participants produced significantly longer VOTs after being exposed to target speech with extended VOTs. Furthermore, this modeled feature was generalized to new instances of the target phoneme /p/ and the new phoneme /k/, indicating that sub-lexical units are involved in phonetic imitation. The data also revealed that lexical frequency had an effect on the degree of imitation. On the other hand, target speech with reduced VOT was not imitated, indicating that phonetic imitation is phonetically selective.

[1]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  Analyzing Linguistic Data: Solutions to the exercises , 2008 .

[2]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Multi-level Exemplar Theory 1. Exemplar-theoretic Syntax , 2010 .

[3]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  A. Samuel,et al.  Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[6]  W. Cooper.  Speech Perception and Production: Studies in Selective Adaptation , 1979 .

[7]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  1 Title : Reassignment of the flap allophone in rapid dialect adaptation , 2012 .

[8]  Molly Babel.  Phonetic and social selectivity in speech accommodation , 2009 .

[9]  S. Grossberg.  How does a brain build a cognitive code , 1980 .

[10]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Gender Differences in Vocal Accommodation: , 2002 .

[11]  W. Labov.  Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors , 1994 .

[12]  S. Grossberg.  The Adaptive Self-Organization of Serial Order in Behavior: Speech, Language, And Motor Control , 1987 .

[13]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[14]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  The next toolkit , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[15]  Walt Detmar Meurers,et al.  Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics , 2006 .

[16]  Edward Flemming.  Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology , 2001, Phonology.

[17]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[18]  H. Nusbaum.  Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception , 1984 .

[19]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Colin Wilson,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Model ofMulti-level Phonetic Imitation , 2008 .

[21]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[22]  E. Tulving,et al.  Richard Semon's Theory of Memory , 1978 .

[23]  H. Giles,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics , 2010 .

[24]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[25]  S. Grossberg,et al.  The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. , 2000 .

[26]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[27]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Multilevel Exemplar Theory , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Joanne L. Miller.  Mapping from acoustic signal to phonetic category: Internal category structure, context effects and speeded categorisation , 2001 .

[29]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  D. Pisoni.  Research on Spoken Language Processing. Progress Report No. 21 (1996-1997). , 1997 .

[31]  V. Fromkin.  Speech errors as linguistic evidence , 1976 .

[32]  C. Fowler,et al.  Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English , 1997 .

[33]  R M Warren,et al.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  P. L. Tenpenny,et al.  Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Paul A Luce,et al.  Representation of lexical form. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[37]  A. Samuel.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  Pattern recognition by humans and machines , 1986 .

[39]  S. Goldinger.  THE ROLE OF PERCEPTUAL EPISODES IN LEXICAL PROCESSING , 2022 .

[40]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[42]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[43]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[44]  Maurizio Gentilucci,et al.  Imitation during phoneme production , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Véronique Delvaux,et al.  The Influence of Ambient Speech on Adult Speech Productions through Unintentional Imitation , 2007, Phonetica.

[46]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[47]  Anna Lubowicz,et al.  Contrast preservation in phonological mappings , 2003 .

[48]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production , 2004 .

[49]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[50]  Jacques Durand,et al.  Phonetics, phonology, and cognition , 2002 .

[51]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & Psychophysics.

[53]  K. Shockley,et al.  Imitation in shadowing words , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  S. Goldinger.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[57]  P. Luce.  Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon , 1986 .

[58]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[59]  Lawrence D. Rosenblum,et al.  Alignment to visual speech information , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[60]  Richard W. Wright,et al.  Lexical Competition and Reduction in Speech: A Preliminary Report 1 , 1997 .

[61]  Richard Wright,et al.  The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[62]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[64]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[65]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors , 2007, Cognition.

[66]  R. Wright.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation , 2004 .

[67]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[68]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[69]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate , 2001 .