Evolving Regulatory Approaches for Managing Fatigue Risk in Transport Operations

Fatigue is a physiological state of reduced performance capability resulting from sleep loss or extended wakefulness, circadian phase, or workload (mental and/or physical activity) that can impair a transport worker's alertness and ability to work safely. Fatigue is affected by all waking activities, not only those that are work related. Consequently, fatigue management must be a shared responsibility of regulators, employers, and employees. Prescriptive hours-of-service limits, the traditional regulatory approach for managing fatigue, are increasingly being challenged with regard to their effectiveness in delivering safety and their cost to industry. Fatigue risk management systems (FRMSs) are a new regulatory approach that combines advances in the understanding of worker fatigue and accident causation with advances in safety management. FRMSs are data driven, are based on combined scientific and operational expertise, and include processes for monitoring their safety performance and for continuous improvement. Prescriptive hours-of-work limits are familiar and are arguably adequate in circumstances where fatigue-related safety risk is low. On the other hand, economic pressures are expected to continue to push transport companies to maximize use of vehicles/locomotives/vessels/aircraft with minimum safe manning levels. These pressures will drive the need for more tailored and flexible approaches to fatigue management, such as FRMSs. Keywords: Driver distraction; Language: en

[1]  D. Dinges,et al.  Maximizing sensitivity of the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) to sleep loss. , 2011, Sleep.

[2]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Validation of the Karolinska sleepiness scale against performance and EEG variables , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Belenky,et al.  Effects of sleep/wake history and circadian phase on proposed pilot fatigue safety performance indicators , 2015, Journal of sleep research.

[4]  Jim Mangie,et al.  Crew fatigue safety performance indicators for fatigue risk management systems. , 2014, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  C. Sargent,et al.  The influence of circadian time and sleep dose on subjective fatigue ratings. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Gregory Belenky,et al.  Pilot fatigue: relationships with departure and arrival times, flight duration, and direction. , 2014, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  A. Chang,et al.  Neurobehavioral performance in young adults living on a 28-h day for 6 weeks. , 2009, Sleep.

[8]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. , 1990, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  P. Gander,et al.  Flight Crew Fatigue Management in a More Flexible Regulatory Environment: An Overview of the New Zealand Aviation Industry , 2008, Chronobiology international.

[10]  Drew Dawson,et al.  Managing fatigue: it's about sleep. , 2005, Sleep medicine reviews.

[11]  Ann Mills,et al.  Fatigue risk management: Organizational factors at the regulatory and industry/company level. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Régis Mollard,et al.  Research and guidelines for implementing Fatigue Risk Management Systems for the French regional airlines. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  C. Sargent,et al.  Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony. , 2011, Sleep.