18F-FDG PET/CT as an Indicator of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Osteosarcoma

The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate whether maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion gylcolysis (TLG), or change therein using 18F-FDG PET/CT performed before and after initial chemotherapy were indicators of patient outcome. Methods: Thirty-one consecutive patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before and after chemotherapy, followed by tumor resection, were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate Cox regression was used to analyze for relationships between covariates of interest (SUVmax before and after chemotherapy, change in SUVmax, TLG before and after chemotherapy, change in TLG, and tumor necrosis) and progression-free and overall survival. Logistic regression was used to evaluate tumor necrosis. Results: High SUVmax before and after chemotherapy (P = 0.008 and P = 0.009, respectively) was associated with worse progression-free survival. The cut point for SUVmax before chemotherapy was greater than 15 g/mL* (P = 0.015), and after chemotherapy it was greater than 5 g/mL* (P = 0.006), as measured at our institution and using lean body mass. Increase in TLG after chemotherapy was associated with worse progression-free survival (P = 0.016). High SUVmax after chemotherapy was associated with poor overall survival (P = 0.035). The cut point was above the median of 3.3 g/mL* (P = 0.043). High TLG before chemotherapy was associated with poor overall survival (P = 0.021). Good overall and progression-free survival was associated with a tumor necrosis greater than 90% (P = 0.018 and 0.08, respectively). A tumor necrosis greater than 90% was most strongly associated with a decrease in SUVmax (P = 0.015). Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used as a prognostic indicator for progression-free survival, overall survival, and tumor necrosis in osteosarcoma.

[1]  J. Edeiken,et al.  Small cell osteosarcoma. A clinicopathologic study of 27 cases , 1989, Cancer.

[2]  J. Eary,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F‐18]‐fluorodeoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography , 2002, Cancer.

[3]  John L. Humm,et al.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[4]  Andreas Bockisch,et al.  Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  F. Bertoni,et al.  Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma: The experience of the Rizzoli Institute , 2005, Cancer.

[6]  W. Roa,et al.  Iterative threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  A. Ho,et al.  Large Institutional Experience with Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Support in the Management of Sarcoma Patients , 2008, Oncology.

[8]  F. Sim,et al.  Malignant bone tumors. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[9]  O. Schober,et al.  Evaluation of Chemotherapy Response in Primary Bone Tumors with F-18 FDG Positron Emission Tomography Compared with Histologically Assessed Tumor Necrosis , 2000, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[10]  P. Picci,et al.  Prognostic and therapeutic relevance of HER2 expression in osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[11]  Dafydd G. Thomas,et al.  Primary versus radiation‐associated craniofacial osteosarcoma , 2006, Cancer.

[12]  G. Rosen,et al.  Survival, prognosis, and therapeutic response in osteogenic sarcoma. The memorial hospital experience , 1992, Cancer.

[13]  W. Winkelmann,et al.  Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Cullen,et al.  Improved Survival in Primary Nonmetastatic Pediatric Osteosarcoma of the Extremity , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Long-term outcome for patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity treated at the istituto ortopedico rizzoli according to the istituto ortopedico rizzoli/osteosarcoma-2 protocol: an updated report. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  N. Jaffe,et al.  Conventional and dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. , 1996, Cancer.

[17]  N. Daw,et al.  Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: The St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's experience , 2007, Cancer.

[18]  Aswin L Hoffmann,et al.  Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Ukihide Tateishi,et al.  Bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer: morphologic and metabolic monitoring of response to systemic therapy with integrated PET/CT. , 2008, Radiology.

[20]  S. Reske,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response of osteogenic sarcoma using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Hollinger,et al.  Response of Osteosarcoma to Chemotherapy. Evaluation with F-18 FDG-PET Scans. , 2000, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[22]  M. Link,et al.  Phase II/III trial of etoposide and high-dose ifosfamide in newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: a pediatric oncology group trial. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Y. Dobashi,et al.  Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG uptake in primary osteosarcoma after but not before chemotherapy: a possible association with autocrine motility factor/phosphoglucose isomerase expression , 2008, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[24]  M. Gebhardt,et al.  Survival Data for 648 Patients with Osteosarcoma Treated at One Institution , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  David Schuster,et al.  Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  J. Wunder,et al.  Prognosis of Radiation-induced Bone Sarcoma is Similar to Primary Osteosarcoma , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  H. Steinert,et al.  Therapy response evaluation in malignant pleural mesothelioma with integrated PET-CT imaging. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[30]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  John L. Humm,et al.  Use of PET to monitor the response of lung cancer to radiation treatment , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  D. Yan,et al.  Clinical implications of defining the gross tumor volume with combination of CT and 18FDG-positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  S. Bielack,et al.  [Scintigraphic follow-up of osteosarcoma during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results of the cooperative osteosarcoma study of the Society for Pediatric Oncology]. , 1988, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[34]  N. Jaffe,et al.  Effect of cumulative courses of intraarterial cis‐diamminedichloroplatin‐ii on the primary tumor in osteosarcoma , 1989, Cancer.

[35]  R. Grimer,et al.  Pre- and post-chemotherapy alkaline phosphatase levels as prognostic indicators in adults with localised osteosarcoma. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[36]  T. Peabody,et al.  Staging of Primary Malignancies of Bone , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[37]  O. Schober,et al.  Prognostic significance of (18)F-FDG and (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate uptake in primary osteosarcoma. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  H. Gerth,et al.  Significant Benefit of Multimodal Imaging: PET/CT Compared with PET Alone in Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Ewing Tumors , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  A. N. Mirza,et al.  Outcome of Postradiation Osteosarcoma Does Not Correlate with Chemotherapy Response , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  W. Enneking,et al.  Current concepts review. The surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  S. Larson,et al.  Sequential preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment of response to preoperative chemoradiation: a means for determining longterm outcomes of rectal cancer. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[42]  F. Sim,et al.  Small cell osteosarcoma of bone , 1997, Cancer.

[43]  J. Murray,et al.  Osteosarcoma chemotherapy effect: a prognostic factor. , 1987, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.