A branch scale analytical model for predicting the vegetation collection efficiency of ultrafine particles

Abstract The removal of ultrafine particles (UFP) by vegetation is now receiving significant attention given their role in cloud physics, human health and respiratory related diseases. Vegetation is known to be a sink for UFP, prompting interest in their collection efficiency. A number of models have tackled the UFP collection efficiency of an isolated leaf or a flat surface; however, up-scaling these theories to the ecosystem level has resisted complete theoretical treatment. To progress on a narrower scope of this problem, simultaneous experimental and theoretical investigations are carried out at the “intermediate” branch scale. Such a scale retains the large number of leaves and their interaction with the flow without the heterogeneities and added geometric complexities encountered within ecosystems. The experiments focused on the collection efficiencies of UFP in the size range 12.6–102 nm for pine and juniper branches in a wind tunnel facility. Scanning mobility particle sizers were used to measure the concentration of each diameter class of UFP upstream and downstream of the vegetation branches thereby allowing the determination of the UFP vegetation collection efficiencies. The UFP vegetation collection efficiency was measured at different wind speeds (0.3–1.5 m s−1), packing density (i.e. volume fraction of leaf or needle fibers; 0.017 and 0.040 for pine and 0.037, 0.055 for juniper), and branch orientations. These measurements were then used to investigate the performance of a proposed analytical model that predicts the branch-scale collection efficiency using conventional canopy properties such as the drag coefficient and leaf area density. Despite the numerous simplifications employed, the proposed analytical model agreed with the wind tunnel measurements mostly to within 20%. This analytical tractability can benefit future air quality and climate models incorporating UFP.

[1]  K. Spurny,et al.  Advances in aerosol filtration , 1998 .

[2]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[3]  B. Hicks,et al.  A preliminary multiple resistance routine for deriving dry deposition velocities from measured quantities , 1987 .

[4]  D. Dockery,et al.  Epidemiologic evidence of cardiovascular effects of particulate air pollution. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  J. Finnigan,et al.  A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer , 2007 .

[6]  Kiros Berhane,et al.  Traffic, Susceptibility, and Childhood Asthma , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  A. Baille,et al.  Modele numerique de dispersion des polluants atmospheriques en presence de couverts vegetaux: Application aux couverts forestiers , 1976 .

[8]  A. Khlystov,et al.  Investigation of Ultrafine Particle Deposition to Vegetation Branches in a Wind Tunnel , 2012 .

[9]  W. Slinn,et al.  Predictions for particle deposition on natural waters , 1980 .

[10]  Maria Cristina Facchini,et al.  The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation , 2005 .

[11]  A. Nowak,et al.  Field measurements and size-resolved model simulations of turbulent particle transport to a forest canopy , 2006 .

[12]  W. Slinn,et al.  Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies , 1982 .

[13]  A. Thom,et al.  Turbulence in and above Plant Canopies , 1981 .

[14]  Sotiris E. Pratsinis,et al.  Particle coagulation, diffusion and thermophoresis in laminar tube flows , 1989 .

[15]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  Development and validation of a size-resolved particle dry deposition scheme for application in aerosol transport models , 2010 .

[16]  Constantinos Sioutas,et al.  Potential Role of Ultrafine Particles in Associations between Airborne Particle Mass and Cardiovascular Health , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  S. Larsen,et al.  Size‐resolved fluxes of sub‐100‐nm particles over forests , 2009 .

[18]  Jonathan Williams,et al.  Application of the variability-size relationship to atmospheric aerosol studies: estimating aerosol lifetimes and ages , 2002 .

[19]  J. Finnigan Turbulence in plant canopies , 2000 .

[20]  S. Israelsson,et al.  Effect of atmospheric electricity on dry deposition of airborne particles from atmosphere , 2001 .

[21]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  The Effect of Vegetation Density on Canopy Sub-Layer Turbulence , 2004 .

[22]  Jian Feng A size‐resolved model and a four‐mode parameterization of dry deposition of atmospheric aerosols , 2008 .

[23]  Oak leaves as aerosol collectors: relationships with wind velocity and particle size distribution. Experimental results and their implications , 2009, Trees.

[24]  C. Bernhofer,et al.  Constructing wind profiles in forests from limited measurements of wind and vegetation structure , 2010 .

[25]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Aerodynamic properties of a plant of complex structure , 1971 .

[26]  Cliff I. Davidson,et al.  The influence of surface structure on predicted particle dry deposition to natural grass canopies , 1982 .

[27]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Aerosol nucleation and its role for clouds and Earth's radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2010 .

[28]  B. Hicks,et al.  A review of the current status of knowledge on dry deposition , 2000 .

[29]  M. Caporaloni,et al.  Transfer of Particles in Nonisotropic Air Turbulence , 1975 .

[30]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Modelling the fate of ultrafine particles from exhaust pipe to rural background: an analysis of time scales for dilution, coagulation and deposition , 2004 .

[31]  S. Larsen,et al.  Upward fluxes of particles over forests: when, where, why? , 2008 .

[32]  S. Friedlander Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics , 2000 .

[33]  R. Barthelmie,et al.  A review of measurement and modelling results of particle atmosphere–surface exchange , 2008 .

[34]  P. Adams,et al.  Efficiency of cloud condensation nuclei formation from ultrafine particles , 2006 .

[35]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Modeling particle deposition from fully developed turbulent flow in ventilation duct , 2006 .

[36]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Thermophoretic particle deposition efficiency in turbulent tube flow , 2008 .

[37]  G. Sehmel Particle and gas dry deposition: A review , 1980 .

[38]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Surface exchange characteristics of leaves subject to mutual interference , 1973 .

[39]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations , 2011 .

[40]  M. Raupach,et al.  Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies , 1982 .

[41]  F. Anselmet,et al.  Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part I: Review of present knowledge , 2008 .

[42]  Christophe Sanz,et al.  ONE- and TWO-Equation Models for Canopy Turbulence , 2004 .

[43]  R. D. Wiffen,et al.  Emission and deposition of petrol engine exhaust Pb--I. Deposition of exhaust Pb to plant and soil surfaces. , 1977, Atmospheric environment.

[44]  William G. Nickling,et al.  Direct field measurement of wind drag on vegetation for application to windbreak design and modelling , 1998 .

[45]  Fabien Anselmet,et al.  Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part II: A new modelling approach and applications , 2008 .

[46]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[47]  T. Vesala,et al.  The effects of the canopy medium on dry deposition velocities of aerosol particles in the canopy sub-layer above forested ecosystems , 2011 .

[48]  Moyer D. Thomas Gas Damage to Plants , 1951 .

[49]  R. P. Hosker,et al.  Review: Atmospheric deposition and plant assimilation of gases and particles , 1982 .

[50]  S. Belcher,et al.  Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[51]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  T. Vesala,et al.  Predicting the dry deposition of aerosol-sized particles using layer-resolved canopy and pipe flow analogy models: Role of turbophoresis , 2010 .

[53]  Diffusion and electric charge contributions to below-cloud wet removal of atmospheric ultra-fine aerosol particles , 2004 .

[54]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module , 2001 .

[55]  W. Kuttler,et al.  On the reduction of urban particle concentration by vegetation : a review , 2008 .

[56]  A. Venäläinen,et al.  Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations , 2006 .

[57]  Diego L. Valera,et al.  A Wind Tunnel Study of Airflow through Horticultural Crops: Determination of the Drag Coefficient , 2006 .