Sustainable Innovation, Management Accounting and Control Systems, and International Performance

This study analyzes how Management Accounting and Control Systems (MACS) facilitate the appropriation of the benefits of sustainable innovations in organizations. In particular, this paper examines the moderating role of different types of MACS in the relationships between sustainable innovation and international performance at an organizational level. We collected survey data from 123 Spanish and Portuguese organizations. Partial Least Square was used to analyze the data. Results show that the effect of sustainable innovations on international performance is enhanced by contemporary rather than traditional types of MACS. Overall our findings show that MACS can help managers to develop and monitor organizational activities (e.g., costumer services and distribution activities), which support the appropriation of the potential benefits from sustainable innovation. This paper responds to recent calls for in-depth studies about the organizational mechanism that may enhance the success of sustainable innovation.

[1]  Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras,et al.  The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on process and organizational innovation , 2016 .

[2]  Lan Guo,et al.  Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations , 2007 .

[3]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[4]  C. Herzig,et al.  Management control for sustainability strategy , 2011 .

[5]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field , 2013 .

[6]  武彦 福島 持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[7]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Can Quality‐Oriented Firms Develop Innovative New Products? , 2009 .

[9]  Francesco Testa,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitiveness within SMEs of the Fashion Industry: Evidence from Italy and France , 2014 .

[10]  Shahid L. Ansari,et al.  Towards an open systems approach to budgeting , 1979 .

[11]  Jean-François Henri,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective , 2006 .

[12]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Accounting and Control, Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Venturing into New Research Opportunities , 2009 .

[13]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[14]  Carla Mendoza,et al.  How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours? , 2013 .

[15]  J. Sharp,et al.  The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance , 2008 .

[16]  F. Boons,et al.  Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview , 2013 .

[18]  Hamed M. Shamma,et al.  Customer‐driven benchmarking: A strategic approach toward a sustainable marketing performance , 2013 .

[19]  John C. Narver,et al.  Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. , 2004 .

[21]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[22]  R. Anthony,et al.  Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1965 .

[23]  R. Chenhall Accounting for the horizontal organization: A review essay , 2008 .

[24]  I. Galarraga,et al.  Impacto económico de la eco-innovación en Euskadi. Una aproximación cuantitativa , 2014 .

[25]  M.R.M. Crul,et al.  Design for Sustainability: Current Trends in Sustainable Product Design and Development , 2009 .

[26]  M. Wagner Links between sustainability-related innovation and sustainability management , 2008 .

[27]  S. Hart,et al.  Roles, role performance, and radical innovation competences , 2011 .

[28]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study , 1998 .

[29]  Habib Mahama,et al.  Management control systems, cooperation and performance in strategic supply relationships: A survey in the mines , 2006 .

[30]  Gerhard Schiefer,et al.  Food chain management for sustainable food system development: a European research agenda† , 2008 .

[31]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Beating Competitors to International Markets: The Value of Geographically Balanced Networks for Innovation , 2014 .

[32]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[33]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs , 2011 .

[34]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[35]  K. Ibeh,et al.  Top barriers and drivers to SME internationalisation , 2009 .

[36]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 1996, ICIS.

[37]  Marcus Wagner,et al.  The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects , 2010 .

[38]  Josep Bisbe,et al.  The Choice of Interactive Control Systems under Different Innovation Management Modes , 2009 .

[39]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[40]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Balanced Scorecard , 2019, Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition.

[41]  D. Otley,et al.  The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation , 2004 .

[42]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Business performance and strategic new product development activities: An empirical investigation , 1995 .

[43]  Simon Cadez,et al.  An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting , 2008 .

[44]  C. F. Phillips Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[45]  Clyde Eiríkur Hull,et al.  Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation , 2008 .

[46]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities , 2002 .

[47]  Robert A. Simons,et al.  Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal , 1994 .

[48]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[49]  A. Dunk Product innovation, budgetary control, and the financial performance of firms , 2011 .

[50]  M. Ezzamel,et al.  Globalization discourses and performance measurement systems in a multinational firm , 2013 .

[51]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[52]  M. Frondel,et al.  End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries , 2007 .

[53]  J. Corbett,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability in Small Handicraft Businesses in Mexico , 2011 .

[54]  M. Goold,et al.  The paradox of strategic controls , 1990 .

[55]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[56]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  An R&D Management Framework for Eco-Technology , 2011 .

[57]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: from a literature review towards a conceptual framework , 2014 .

[58]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The internationalization and performance of SMEs , 2001 .

[59]  Gert Van Hoof,et al.  Assessment of Progressive Product Innovation on Key Environmental Indicators: Pampers ® Baby Wipes from 2007–2013 , 2014 .

[60]  Nejc M. Jakopin,et al.  The degree of internationalization and the financial performance of European mobile network operators , 2005 .

[61]  Valérie Swaen,et al.  Environmental Management Control Systems: The role of contextual and strategic factors , 2013 .