Noise minimization by multicompression approach in elasticity imaging [biomedical ultrasonic imaging]

Breast lesion visibility in static strain imaging ultimately is noise limited. When correlation and related techniques are applied to estimate local displacements between two echo frames recorded before and after a deformation, target contrast increases linearly with the amount of deformation applied. However, above some deformation threshold, decorrelation noise increases more than contrast such that lesion visibility is severely reduced. Multicompression methods avoid this problem by accumulating displacements from many small deformations to provide the same net increase in lesion contrast as one large deformation but with minimal decorrelation noise. Unfortunately, multicompression approaches accumulate echo noise (electronic and sampling) with each deformation step as contrast builds so that lesion visibility can again be reduced if the applied deformation increment is too small. This paper uses signal models and analysis techniques to develop multicompression strategies that minimize strain image noise. The analysis predicts that displacement variance is minimal when the applied strain increment is 0.0035 for typical breast imaging conditions. Predictions are verified experimentally with gelatin phantoms. For in vivo breast imaging, a strain increment as low as 0.0015 is recommended for minimal noise because of the high heterogeneity of the breast tissue.

[1]  Gregg Trahey,et al.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Covariance analysis of time delay estimates for strained signals , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[5]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[6]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[7]  J. Ophir,et al.  The combined effect of signal decorrelation and random noise on the variance of time delay estimation , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  J. Ophir,et al.  Theoretical bounds on strain estimation in elastography , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Insana,et al.  Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  R S Reneman,et al.  Non-invasive measurement of mechanical properties of arteries in health and disease , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.