Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries

Pharmacology/pharmacy is an important scientific field and plays a pivotal role in new drug research and development. China has steadily increased investment in drug development. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of China in the field pharmacology/pharmacy in the past decade in relation to ten representative countries. The publications in the field pharmacology/pharmacy of China and ten representative countries in the past decade (2001–2010) were retrieved from Web of Science database, and studies were conducted on the immediacy index of articles published in 2011. Multiple bibliometric indicators were obtained from the “InCites” analysis. Most of the bibliometric indicators for the developed countries including the USA and the European countries remained stable in the past decade. The number of publications by the Asian countries, especially China, increased dramatically in the past decade year by year; however, the Asian countries improved little in the indicators assessing the scientific quality of publications including the citation behaviors and the impact relative to either country and subject area. It may need a long time to fill in the gap, in terms of the scientific quality, between the developing countries and the developed countries. In view of the dramatic increase in the financial investment, our findings suggest that the development of the field pharmacology/pharmacy worldwide is not optimistic, which may partially explain the decreased R&D productivity of pharmaceutical industry since the last decade.

[1]  Xu Zhang,et al.  Scientific production and citation impact: a bibliometric analysis in acupuncture over three decades , 2012, Scientometrics.

[2]  Elizabeth Smith Aversa,et al.  Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature , 1985, Scientometrics.

[3]  Nan Ma,et al.  A comparative study of research performance in computer science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[4]  Cristian Scutaru,et al.  Scientometric Analysis and Combined Density-Equalizing Mapping of Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Research , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Measuring China"s research performance using the Science Citation Index , 2002, Scientometrics.

[6]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[7]  Jin-jian Lu,et al.  Multi-Target Drugs: The Trend of Drug Research and Development , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[9]  Arie Rip,et al.  Qualitative conditions of scientometrics: The new challenges , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  D. Gnana Bharathi,et al.  Methodology for the evaluation of scientific journals: Aggregated Citations of Cited Articles , 2011, Scientometrics.

[11]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[12]  Elizabeth S. Vieira,et al.  Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[13]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  Surviving bad times: The role of citations, self-citations and numbers of citable items in recovery of the journal impact factor after at least four years of continuous decreases , 2009, Scientometrics.

[15]  J. Scannell,et al.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  E Garfield,et al.  "Science Citation Index"--A New Dimension in Indexing. , 1964, Science.

[17]  Simon Chapman,et al.  The Association between Four Citation Metrics and Peer Rankings of Research Influence of Australian Researchers in Six Fields of Public Health , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[18]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[19]  D. Aksnes,et al.  Researchers’ perceptions of citations , 2009 .

[20]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor--is it a force for good or harm? , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Alexander N. Larcombe,et al.  Self-citation: comparison between Radiology, European Radiology and Radiology for 1997–1998 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[22]  F. Pammolli,et al.  The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.