The association between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic subtraction in adults.

There are two well-known computation methods for solving multi-digit subtraction items, namely mental and algorithmic computation. It has been contended that mental and algorithmic computation differentially rely on numerical magnitude processing, an assumption that has already been examined in children, but not yet in adults. Therefore, in this study, we examined how numerical magnitude processing was associated with mental and algorithmic computation, and whether this association with numerical magnitude processing was different for mental versus algorithmic computation. We also investigated whether the association between numerical magnitude processing and mental and algorithmic computation differed for measures of symbolic versus nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing. Results showed that symbolic, and not nonsymbolic, numerical magnitude processing was associated with mental computation, but not with algorithmic computation. Additional analyses showed, however, that the size of this association with symbolic numerical magnitude processing was not significantly different for mental and algorithmic computation. We also tried to further clarify the association between numerical magnitude processing and complex calculation by also including relevant arithmetical subskills, i.e. arithmetic facts, needed for complex calculation that are also known to be dependent on numerical magnitude processing. Results showed that the associations between symbolic numerical magnitude processing and mental and algorithmic computation were fully explained by individual differences in elementary arithmetic fact knowledge.

[1]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Efficient and flexible strategy use on multi-digit sums: a choice/no-choice study , 2013 .

[2]  Karin Landerl,et al.  Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Mm. Liabre.  Standard Progressive Matrices , 1984 .

[4]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. , 2012, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[5]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Impact of High Mathematics Education on the Number Sense , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Janosch Linkersdörfer,et al.  Symbolic and non-symbolic distance effects in children and their connection with arithmetic skills , 2011, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[10]  Martha Carr,et al.  Gender Differences in Arithmetic Strategy Use: A Function of Skill and Preference. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[11]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  The association between numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic multi-digit subtraction in children , 2015 .

[12]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Numerical Magnitude Representations and Individual Differences in Children's Arithmetic Strategy Use , 2012 .

[15]  Qixuan Chen,et al.  Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[17]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[18]  Daniela Lucangeli,et al.  Arithmetic Education and Learning Disabilities in Italy , 2004, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[19]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence , 2011, Cognition.

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Judith T. Sowder,et al.  Estimation and number sense. , 1992 .

[22]  M. Linn,et al.  New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[24]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Daniel B. Berch,et al.  Making Sense of Number Sense , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[27]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[28]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Solving subtraction problems flexibly by means of indirect addition , 2010 .

[29]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Whole number concepts and operations , 2007 .

[30]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.

[32]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  SCADS: A Model of Children's Strategy Choices and Strategy Discoveries , 1998 .

[33]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  The association between children's numerical magnitude processing and mental multi-digit subtraction. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[34]  Lisa K Fazio,et al.  Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.