Group Polarization in a Model of Information Aggregation

Experiments identify the empirical regularity that groups tend to make decisions that are more extreme, but in the same direction as the tendency of individual members of the group. We present a model of information aggregation consistent with these findings. We assume individuals and groups are rational decision makers facing monotone statistical decision problems where groups and individuals have common preferences, but groups have superior information. We provide conditions under which the distribution of the optimal actions of the group is more variable than the distribution of actions taken by individuals. (JEL D71, D83)

[1]  D. Blackwell.  Equivalent Comparisons of Experiments , 1953 .

[2]  Haim Levy,et al.  Ordering Uncertain Options with Borrowing and Lending , 1978 .

[3]  R. Brown.  Social Psychology: The Second Edition , 1986 .

[4]  M. Kaplan.  Discussion Polarization Effects in a Modified Jury Decision Paradigm: Informational Influences , 1977 .

[5]  E. Pitman,et al.  Sufficient statistics and intrinsic accuracy , 1936, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  Moshe Shaked,et al.  Multivariate Stochastic Orders , 2007 .

[7]  E. Lehmann.  Comparing Location Experiments , 1988 .

[8]  Baron,et al.  Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[9]  Kenneth P. Dietrich,et al.  THREE ESSAYS ON INFORMATION ECONOMICS , 2015 .

[10]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[11]  Joel Sobel,et al.  On the relationship between individual and group decisions , 2014 .

[12]  J. Weibull,et al.  Political polarization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Deliberative Trouble - Why Groups Go to Extremes , 2000 .

[14]  Susan Athey,et al.  The Value of Information in Monotone Decision Problems , 1998 .

[15]  Michael A. Wallach,et al.  DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND LEVEL OF RISK TAKING IN GROUPS. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  David G. Myers,et al.  Attitude Comparison: Is There Ever a Bandwagon Effect?1 , 1977 .

[17]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Components of group risk taking , 1967 .

[18]  B. O. Koopman.  On distributions admitting a sufficient statistic , 1936 .

[19]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Unanimity and compromise among probability forecasters , 1990 .

[20]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Choice Shifts in Groups: A Decision-Theoretic Basis , 2006 .

[21]  Bruno Strulovici,et al.  Comparative Statics, Informativeness, and the Interval Dominance Order , 2009 .

[22]  R. Bordley.  A Bayesian model of group polarization , 1983 .

[23]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[24]  Juri Demuth.  Three essays in information economics , 2012 .

[25]  Moshe Shaked,et al.  Stochastic orders and their applications , 1994 .

[26]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[27]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social decision schemes under risk. , 1974 .

[28]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[29]  T. Cason,et al.  A Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game , 1997 .

[30]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Four Failures of Deliberating Groups , 2008 .

[31]  Ming-Deh A. Huang,et al.  Proof of proposition 2 , 1992 .

[32]  J. Sobel.  Forecasting Group Decisions from Individual Behavior : Impossibility Results ∗ , 2012 .

[33]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. , 1974 .

[34]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Interpreted and generated signals , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[35]  Marc Goovaerts,et al.  Exact Credibility for Weighted Observations , 1997, ASTIN Bulletin.

[36]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Extremism and Social Learning , 2007 .

[37]  H. Belloc.  The Free Press , 2002 .

[38]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization in Simulated Juries , 1976 .

[39]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Sensitivity of Weights in Combining Forecasts , 1992, Oper. Res..

[40]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Deliberating About Dollars: The Severity Shift , 2000 .

[41]  M. Billig,et al.  Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization , 1971 .

[42]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[43]  D. Dolinski,et al.  Social Influence , 2007 .

[44]  J. Stoner.  Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions: The Influence of Widely Held Values , 2015 .

[45]  Attila Ambrus,et al.  How Individual Preferences Get Aggregated in Groups - An Experimental Study , 2013 .

[46]  C. Silverthorne.  Information Input and the Group Shift Phenomenon in Risk Taking. , 1971 .

[47]  James Andreoni,et al.  Diverging Opinions , 2007 .

[48]  J. Stoner.  A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk , 1961 .

[49]  R. Bordley.  A Multiplicative Formula for Aggregating Probability Assessments , 1982 .

[50]  Amiram D. Vinokur,et al.  What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts , 1975 .