Rituximab maintenance for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND Follicular lymphoma is characterized by slow growth and an initially high rate of response to treatment, but patients typically relapse and experience progressive disease. Rituximab in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with follicular lymphoma compared with chemotherapy alone, but data from randomized clinical trials evaluating rituximab maintenance treatment in these patients are limited. We aimed to evaluate the effect of maintenance treatment with rituximab on the overall survival of patients with follicular lymphoma. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared rituximab maintenance therapy with observation or treatment at relapse (no maintenance therapy). We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, conference proceedings, databases of ongoing trials, and references of published trials. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the trials and extracted data. Hazard ratios for time-to-event data were estimated and pooled. RESULTS Five trials including 1143 adult patients were included in this meta-analysis. Data for 985 patients with follicular lymphoma were available for the meta-analysis of overall survival. Patients treated with maintenance rituximab had statistically significantly better overall survival than patients in the observation arm or patients treated at relapse (hazard ratio [HR] for death = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45 to 0.79). The rate of infection-related adverse events was higher with rituximab maintenance treatment (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.21 to 3.27). Patients with refractory or relapsed (ie, previously treated) follicular lymphoma had a survival benefit with maintenance rituximab therapy (HR for death = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.79), whereas previously untreated patients did not (HR for death = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.37 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that maintenance therapy with rituximab, either as four weekly infusions every 6 months or as a single infusion every 2-3 months, should be added to standard therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory (ie, previously treated) follicular lymphoma after successful induction therapy. The higher rate of infections with rituximab therapy should be taken into consideration when making treatment decisions.

[1]  Yana Zhang,et al.  B-cell depletion for 2 years after autologous stem cell transplant for NHL induces prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia beyond the rituximab maintenance period , 2008, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[2]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Predictive Factors to Hypogammaglobulinemia and Non-Neutropenic Infection Complications after Rituximab/Chemotherapy Treatment , 2007 .

[3]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Chemotherapy plus Rituximab versus chemotherapy alone for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Cyclophosphamide and fludarabine (CF) in advanced indolent lymphoma: Results from the ECOG/CALGB intergroup E1496 trial , 2007 .

[6]  M. Sydes,et al.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis , 2007, Trials.

[7]  A. Stevens,et al.  Rituximab in lymphoma: a systematic review and consensus practice guideline from Cancer Care Ontario. , 2007, Cancer treatment reviews.

[8]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Clinical Trials and Observations , 2005 .

[10]  Max Wolf,et al.  Rituximab maintenance improves clinical outcome of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients both with and without rituximab during induction: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 intergroup trial. , 2006, Blood.

[11]  J. Shortt,et al.  Adjuvant rituximab causes prolonged hypogammaglobulinaemia following autologous stem cell transplant for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2006, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[12]  G. Rossi,et al.  Delayed-onset peripheral blood cytopenia after rituximab: Frequency and risk factor assessment in a consecutive series of 77 treatments , 2006, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[13]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Maintenance Rituximab after CVP Results in Superior Clinical Outcome in Advanced Follicular Lymphoma (FL): Results of the E1496 Phase III Trial from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 2005 .

[14]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Maximizing therapeutic benefit of rituximab: maintenance therapy versus re-treatment at progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a randomized phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  N. Mendenhall,et al.  Phase II trial of individualized rituximab dosing for patients with CD20-positive lymphoproliferative disorders. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  S. H. Lim,et al.  Maintenance rituximab after autologous stem cell transplant for high-risk B-cell lymphoma induces prolonged and severe hypogammaglobulinemia , 2005, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[18]  M. Ghielmini,et al.  Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with the standard weekly x 4 schedule. , 2004, Blood.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  K. Maclennan,et al.  Long-term effect of a watch and wait policy versus immediate systemic treatment for asymptomatic advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[21]  E. Lanino,et al.  Long-lasting hypogammaglobulinemia following rituximab administration for Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease preemptive therapy. , 2003, Journal of hematotherapy & stem cell research.

[22]  J. Armitage,et al.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[25]  S. Horning Natural history of and therapy for the indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. , 1993, Seminars in oncology.

[26]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.