An Efficient Acoustic Density Estimation Method with Human Detectors Applied to Gibbons in Cambodia

Some animal species are hard to see but easy to hear. Standard visual methods for estimating population density for such species are often ineffective or inefficient, but methods based on passive acoustics show more promise. We develop spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) methods for territorial vocalising species, in which humans act as an acoustic detector array. We use SECR and estimated bearing data from a single-occasion acoustic survey of a gibbon population in northeastern Cambodia to estimate the density of calling groups. The properties of the estimator are assessed using a simulation study, in which a variety of survey designs are also investigated. We then present a new form of the SECR likelihood for multi-occasion data which accounts for the stochastic availability of animals. In the context of gibbon surveys this allows model-based estimation of the proportion of groups that produce territorial vocalisations on a given day, thereby enabling the density of groups, instead of the density of calling groups, to be estimated. We illustrate the performance of this new estimator by simulation. We show that it is possible to estimate density reliably from human acoustic detections of visually cryptic species using SECR methods. For gibbon surveys we also show that incorporating observers’ estimates of bearings to detected groups substantially improves estimator performance. Using the new form of the SECR likelihood we demonstrate that estimates of availability, in addition to population density and detection function parameters, can be obtained from multi-occasion data, and that the detection function parameters are not confounded with the availability parameter. This acoustic SECR method provides a means of obtaining reliable density estimates for territorial vocalising species. It is also efficient in terms of data requirements since since it only requires routine survey data. We anticipate that the low-tech field requirements will make this method an attractive option in many situations where populations can be surveyed acoustically by humans.

[1]  T. Geissmann,et al.  The Conservation Status of Gibbons in Vietnam , 2011 .

[2]  Len Thomas,et al.  Spatially explicit capture–recapture methods to estimate minke whale density from data collected at bottom-mounted hydrophones , 2010, Journal of Ornithology.

[3]  Hjalmar S. Kühl,et al.  Towards the automated detection and occupancy estimation of primates using passive acoustic monitoring , 2015 .

[4]  Kellie D. G. Glessner,et al.  Population Density and Home Range Size of Indri indri in a Protected Low Altitude Rain Forest , 2005, International Journal of Primatology.

[5]  Murray G. Efford,et al.  Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals , 2009 .

[6]  M. Kinnaird,et al.  Abundance and Distribution of Sympatric Gibbons in a Threatened Sumatran Rain Forest , 2004, International Journal of Primatology.

[7]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[8]  Ben C. Stevenson,et al.  A Unifying Model for Capture–Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[9]  Jacqueline L. Frair,et al.  Pairing call-response surveys and distance sampling for a mammalian carnivore , 2015 .

[10]  Warren Y. Brockelman,et al.  Estimation of density of gibbon groups by use of loud songs , 1993, American journal of primatology.

[11]  K. Nekaris,et al.  Vocalizations as a conservation tool: an auditory survey of the Andean titi monkey Callicebus oenanthe Thomas, 1924 (Mammalia: Primates: Pitheciidae) at Tarangue, Northern Peru , 2008 .

[12]  David L. Borchers,et al.  A general framework for animal density estimation from acoustic detections across a fixed microphone array , 2015 .

[13]  Warren Y. Brockelman,et al.  Pileated Gibbon Density in Relation to Habitat Characteristics and Post‐logging Forest Recovery , 2011 .

[14]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[15]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. , 2008, Ecology.

[16]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[17]  S. Cheyne Effects of meteorology, astronomical variables, location and human disturbance on the singing apes: Hylobates albibarbis , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[18]  S. Lappan,et al.  The gibbons : new perspectives on small ape socioecology and population biology , 2009 .

[19]  A. Mootnick,et al.  A new species of crested gibbon, from the central Annamite mountain range , 2010 .

[20]  M. Mühlenberg,et al.  Responding to forest degradation: altered habitat use by Dian's tarsier Tarsius dianae in Sulawesi, Indonesia , 2005, Oryx.

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[22]  E. H. Haimoff,et al.  Loud Calls of the Gibbon (Hylobates Lar): Repertoire, Organisation and Context , 1984 .

[23]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[24]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera‐trap studies , 2009 .

[25]  T. Clements,et al.  Status and Conservation of Yellow-Cheeked Crested Gibbons ( Nomascus gabriellae ) in the Seima Biodiversity Conservation Area, Mondulkiri Province, Cambodia , 2009 .

[26]  S. Buckland Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[27]  A. Estrada,et al.  Survey of black howler (Alouatta pigra) and spider (Ateles geoffroyi) monkeys in the Mayan sites of Calakmul and Yaxchilán, Mexico and Tikal, Guatemala , 2004, Primates.

[28]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. , 2009, Ecology.