Comparison of recovery times and complication rates between a modified slanted slot and the standard ventral slot for the treatment of cervical disc disease in 20 dogs.

OBJECTIVES To compare the recovery times and complication rates between the standard ventral slot and the modified slanted ventral slot for the treatment of cervical disc disease in dogs with the same neurological grade. METHODS A retrospective analysis of an equal number of cervical disc cases for each procedure was carried out specifically to determine the recovery times and complication rates. To allow for meaningful comparison only dogs that had the same neurological grade were selected. Outcomes were determined by time to recover and the resolution of symptoms and complications were graded in terms of severity. RESULTS The standard ventral slot cases had a higher complication rate than the modified slanted slot cases with one case dying in the postoperative period. However, the modified slanted slot cases on average had a marginally slower recovery time than standard ventral slot cases. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Ventral decompression using the modified slanted slot instead of the standard ventral slot will allow for spinal decompression with potentially less destabilisation, and incur a similar incidence of complications and rate of recovery.

[1]  J. Rossmeisl,et al.  A modified lateral approach to the canine cervical spine: procedural description and clinical application in 16 dogs with lateralized compressive myelopathy or radiculopathy. , 2005, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[2]  G. Hosgood,et al.  Vertebral subluxation following ventral cervical decompression in the dog. , 2000, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[3]  G. Hosgood,et al.  Caudal cervical intervertebral disk disease in the small dog: role of distraction and stabilization in ventral slot decompression. , 2000, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.

[4]  W. McCartney.  Partial Pediculectomy for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Disc Disease , 1997, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[5]  S. Butterworth,et al.  A Guide to Canine and Feline Orthopaedic Surgery , 1996 .

[6]  J. Stauffer,et al.  Cardiac dysrhythmias during anesthesia for cervical decompression in the dog. , 1988, American journal of veterinary research.

[7]  M. Atilola,et al.  Cervical chemonucleolysis in the dog. A surgical technique. , 1988, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  D. Hyams,et al.  Clinical observations and client evaluation of ventral decompression for cervical intervertebral disk protrusion. , 1982, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[9]  P. Webbon,et al.  Radiological refresher--10. Bone tumours. , 1978, Journal of Small Animal Practice.

[10]  H. Denny.  The surgical treatment of cervical disc protrusions in the dog: a review of 40 cases. , 1978, The Journal of small animal practice.

[11]  Russell Sw,et al.  Recurrence of cervical disc syndrome in surgically conservatively treated dogs. , 1968 .