Softness, Warmth, and Responsiveness Improve Robot Hugs

Hugs are one of the first forms of contact and affection humans experience. Due to their prevalence and health benefits, roboticists are naturally interested in having robots one day hug humans as seamlessly as humans hug other humans. This project’s purpose is to evaluate human responses to different robot physical characteristics and hugging behaviors. Specifically, we aim to test the hypothesis that a soft, warm, touch-sensitive PR2 humanoid robot can provide humans with satisfying hugs by matching both their hugging pressure and their hugging duration. Thirty relatively young and rather technical participants experienced and evaluated twelve hugs with the robot, divided into three randomly ordered trials that focused on physical robot characteristics (single factor, three levels) and nine randomly ordered trials with low, medium, and high hug pressure and duration (two factors, three levels each). Analysis of the results showed that people significantly prefer soft, warm hugs over hard, cold hugs. Furthermore, users prefer hugs that physically squeeze them and release immediately when they are ready for the hug to end. Taking part in the experiment also significantly increased positive user opinions of robots and robot use.

[1]  H. Harlow,et al.  Affectional responses in the infant monkey; orphaned baby monkeys develop a strong and persistent attachment to inanimate surrogate mothers. , 1959, Science.

[2]  P. Mahalski.  The incidence of attachment objects and oral habits at bedtime in two longitudinal samples of children aged 1.5-7 years. , 1983, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  K. Krauss,et al.  The effects of deep pressure touch on anxiety. , 1987, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. , 1991 .

[5]  T Grandin,et al.  Calming effects of deep touch pressure in patients with autistic disorder, college students, and animals. , 1992, Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology.

[6]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[7]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  N L VandenBerg,et al.  The use of a weighted vest to increase on-task behavior in children with attention difficulties. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The Hug: an exploration of robotic form for intimate communication , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[10]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Human-like natural behavior generation based on involuntary motions for humanoid robots , 2004, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The Design of the Huggable: A Therapeutic Robotic Companion for Relational, Affective Touch , 2006, AAAI Fall Symposium: Caring Machines.

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch , 2006, CCNC 2006. 2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2006..

[13]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  A methodological variation for acceptance evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction in public places , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[14]  J. Bargh,et al.  Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth , 2008, Science.

[15]  Mitsuru Endo,et al.  Partner Ballroom Dance Robot -PBDR- , 2008 .

[16]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents , 2009, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[17]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents , 2009 .

[19]  Christian Heath,et al.  IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication , 2009 .

[20]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Full-body gesture recognition using inertial sensors for playful interaction with small humanoid robot , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Justin W. Hart,et al.  No fair!!: an interaction with a cheating robot , 2010, HRI 2010.

[22]  David C. Hogg,et al.  Embodied conversations: performance and the design of a robotic dancing partner , 2010, Design Studies.

[23]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Recognizing affection for a touch-based interaction with a humanoid robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Gary Charness,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[25]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Can you hold my hand? Physical warmth in human-robot interaction , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Jaeryoung Lee,et al.  I am a warm robot: the effects of temperature in physical human–robot interaction , 2013, Robotica.

[27]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Huggable communication medium decreases cortisol levels , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Replication of “Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth” by Williams and Bargh (2008). , 2014 .

[29]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  An Investigation of Responses to Robot-Initiated Touch in a Nursing Context , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[30]  William J. Doyle,et al.  Does Hugging Provide Stress-Buffering Social Support? A Study of Susceptibility to Upper Respiratory Infection and Illness , 2015, Psychological science.

[31]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Robotic Dance in Social Robotics—A Taxonomy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[32]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Rhythmic Timing in Playful Human-Robot Social Motor Coordination , 2016, ICSR.

[33]  Miao Yu,et al.  Stretchable touch-sensing skin over padding for co-robots , 2016, Smart Materials and Structures.

[34]  R. Trask,et al.  4D sequential actuation: combining ionoprinting and redox chemistry in hydrogels , 2016 .

[35]  Lucy E. Dunne,et al.  Active "hugging" vest for deep touch pressure therapy , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[36]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  A Robot that Encourages Self-disclosure by Hug , 2017, ICSR.

[37]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Does A Robot’s Touch Encourage Human Effort? , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[38]  Mohamed Chetouani,et al.  Automated Prediction of Extraversion During Human–Humanoid Interaction , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[39]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  A hug from a robot encourages prosocial behavior , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[40]  Francesc Moreno-Noguer,et al.  Teaching Robot’s Proactive Behavior Using Human Assistance , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[41]  Jonathan Mummolo,et al.  Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment , 2018, American Political Science Review.

[42]  M. Mori.  THE UNCANNY VALLEY , 2020, The Monster Theory Reader.