Dynamic reliability assessment of ship grounding using Bayesian Inference

The significant increase in the demand for shipping transportation using large vessels in restricted waters, such as cruising cargo vessels in channels, draws worldwide maritime industries’ attention to mitigating potential grounding risks. Safer ship navigation requires a more accurate prediction tool to estimate the likelihood of a ship striking the seabed. This study presents a safety framework for under keel clearance failure analysis of vessels crossing shallow waters. The developed methodology can be applied by the designers, operators and port managers to maintain their shipping fleets operating at an acceptable level of grounding safety. A Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis is applied to estimate the probability of touching the seabed based on the results of dynamic under keel clearance obtained from time-domain hydrodynamic simulations. To illustrate the application of the proposed method, the performance of a large vessel is assessed when entering the Queensland coastal zone with maximum water depth of 12 m. The framework suggests that for a safe navigation with maximum failure probability of 3×10−5, the vessel should cross the passage at a speed lower than 3 m/s where the maximum tolerable incident wave height is 0.5 m.

[1]  Bruce Parker,et al.  Modern Under-Keel Clearance Management , 1998 .

[2]  Philippe Sergent,et al.  Virtual bottom for ships sailing in restricted waterways (unsteady squat) , 2015 .

[3]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[4]  Lucjan Gucma Risk Based Decision Model for Maximal Ship Entry to the Ports , 2004 .

[5]  Pierre Debaillon Système de modélisation de l'enfoncement dynamique des bateaux , 2005 .

[6]  Tim Peter Gourlay Mathematical and Computational Techniques for Predicting the Squat of Ships , 2000 .

[7]  Wiesław Galor,et al.  Determination of Dynamic Under Keel Clearance of Maneuvering Ship , 2008 .

[8]  Malcolm Tull The environmental impact of ports: an Australian case study , 2006 .

[9]  P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder,et al.  Modeling of Ship Motion Responses and its Applications in Risk-Based Desing and Operation of Entrance Channels , 2007 .

[10]  Curtis Smith,et al.  Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment - The current state of the art , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Developing a novel risk-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making in marine renewable energy applications , 2017 .

[12]  Alan Brown,et al.  A Probabilistic Analysis of Tanker Groundings , 1997 .

[13]  D. R. Derrett Ship stability for masters and mates , 1967 .

[14]  Vassilis Papakonstantinou,et al.  Evaluation of the physical risk of ship grounding , 1997 .

[15]  Ming J. Zuo,et al.  Rare Event Analysis Considering Data and Model Uncertainty , 2017 .

[16]  Mark Hemer,et al.  Waves and Climate Change on the Australian Coast , 2024, Journal of Coastal Research.

[17]  Tim Gourlay,et al.  Slender-body methods for predicting ship squat , 2008 .

[18]  Rouzbeh Abbassi,et al.  Major accident modelling using spare data , 2017 .

[19]  Mohammad Javad Ketabdari,et al.  Numerical and experimental study on the dynamic behavior of a sea-star tension leg platform against regular waves , 2016 .

[20]  Lucjan Gucma,et al.  Monte Carlo Method of Ship's Underkeel Clearance Evaluation for Safety of Ferry Approaching to Ystad Port Determination , 2008 .

[21]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of Deterioration Processes through Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2009 .

[22]  Manolis Samuelides,et al.  Survey on grounding incidents: Statistical analysis and risk assessment , 2009 .

[23]  Yi-Ping Chang,et al.  ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS FOR NONHOMOGENEOUS POISSON PROCESS: SOFTWARE RELIABILITY WITH CHANGE-POINT MODEL , 2001 .

[24]  Michael J. Briggs,et al.  Comparison of Measured Ship Squat with Numerical and Empirical Methods , 2013 .

[25]  P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder,et al.  On the Assessment of Ship Grounding Risk in Restricted Channels , 2006 .

[26]  Nick Harvey,et al.  Coastal Management in Australia , 2003 .

[27]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Modeling the risk of ship grounding—a literature review from a risk management perspective , 2014 .

[28]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Precursor-based hierarchical Bayesian approach for rare event frequency estimation: A case of oil spill accidents , 2013 .

[29]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  RISK ANALYSIS OF OFFSHORE TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT IN ARCTIC WATERS , 2017, International Journal of Maritime Engineering.

[30]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Risk-based maintenance planning of subsea pipelines through fatigue crack growth monitoring , 2017 .

[31]  Nicola Paltrinieri,et al.  On the application of near accident data to risk analysis of major accidents , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Nathan Siu,et al.  Bayesian parameter estimation in probabilistic risk assessment , 1998 .

[33]  Madjid Karimirad Stochastic Dynamic Response Analysis of Spar-Type Wind Turbines with Catenary or Taut Mooring Systems , 2011 .

[34]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Dynamic risk‐based maintenance for offshore processing facility , 2016 .

[35]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Spatial Model for Corrosion in Ships and FPSOs , 2014 .

[36]  P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of phytoplankton biomass at the Frisian Inlet (NL) , 2015 .

[37]  Preben Terndrup Pedersen,et al.  Bayesian Networks as a Decision Support Tool in Marine Applications , 2001 .