A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems

As the development and use of automated systems for collaborative work grows, the need for a better understanding of these systems becomes more important. The author's focus is on one type of system, a group support system (GSS), and in particular, on one important aspect of a GSS, anonymity. A conceptual framework for the study of anonymity in a GSS is presented, which describes the general classes of variables and their relationships. These variables include the factors that influence anonymity in a GSS, types of anonymity and the effects of anonymity on a message sender, receiver, group process and outcome. Each of these variables is discussed with working propositions presented for important group process and outcome measures. The objectives are to highlight the importance and complexity of anonymity, to act as a guide for empirical investigations of anonymity, and to influence future GSS development and use.<<ETX>>

[1]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System* , 1991 .

[2]  L. R. Anderson,et al.  Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[4]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[5]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[6]  Alan Robert Dennis,et al.  Parallelism, anonymity, structure, and group size in electronic meetings , 1991 .

[7]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Personality and social behavior , 1985 .

[8]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[11]  Randall Steeb,et al.  A Computer-Based Interactive System for Group Decisionmaking , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Computer-Aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support: Special Focus Article , 1988, Oper. Res..

[14]  G. Evans,et al.  Behavioral and Physiological Consequences of Crowding in Humans , 1979 .

[15]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Group support systems in practice: experience at IBM , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[16]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[17]  T. Connolly,et al.  Toward Atheory of Automated Group Work , 1990 .

[18]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .

[19]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Group decision support systems: the cultural factor , 1989, ICIS '89.

[20]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Process Tracing Methods in Decision Support Systems Research: Exploring the Black Box , 1987, MIS Q..

[22]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[23]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[27]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[28]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..

[29]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems , 1993 .

[30]  William K. Graham,et al.  Tasks and Task Consequences as Factors in Individual and Group brainstorming , 1975 .

[31]  E. Diener.  Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. , 1979 .

[32]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[33]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[34]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[35]  J. Cash,et al.  Information Technology and Tomorrow's Manager , 1988 .

[36]  S. Harkins,et al.  The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing , 1985 .

[37]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[38]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Group Problem Solving in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity on Group Process and Outcome with a Group Decision Support System. , 1988 .

[39]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[41]  Mark A Walker,et al.  The free rider problem: Experimental evidence , 1984 .

[42]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[43]  A. Delbecq,et al.  Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1971 .

[44]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[45]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Work group structure and information technology: a structural contingency approach , 1990 .

[46]  Anne T. McCartt,et al.  Evaluating group decision support system effectiveness: A performance study of decision conferencing , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  Guidelines For Computer-Assisted Group Problem Solving , 1992 .

[48]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[49]  L. Berkowitz.  Group Standards, Cohesiveness, and Productivity , 1954 .

[50]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[51]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[52]  Roger K. Mosvick,et al.  We'Ve Got to Start Meeting Like This!: A Guide to Successful Business Meeting Management , 1986 .

[53]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Deviance In Dark , 1973 .

[54]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[55]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[56]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  The role of plausibility in influencing environmental attributions , 1984 .

[57]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[58]  Robert Albanese,et al.  Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .

[59]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[60]  LoRetta Mann.  The baiting crowd in episodes of threatened suicide. , 1981 .

[61]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The deindividuating effects of anonymity on automated group idea generation. , 1989 .

[62]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[63]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Potential inhibitory effects of group participation on brainstorming performance , 1977 .

[64]  Victor H. Vroom,et al.  The consequences of social interaction in group problem solving , 1969 .

[65]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[66]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[67]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[68]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[69]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[70]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[71]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  COMPUTER-SUPPORTED MEETINGS: BUILDING A RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT. , 1988 .

[72]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Invited Article: A Framework for the Development of Decisoin Support Systems , 1980, MIS Q..

[73]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Implications for problem‐solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literature , 1978 .

[74]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[75]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[76]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[77]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[78]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .