Kids Code in a rural village in Norway: could code clubs be a new arena for increasing girls’ digital interest and competence?

ABSTRACT A trend, where voluntary groups teach children and youth basic computer coding skills, has spread throughout the world. After-school clubs invite children to create games in visual programming environments. The activities emphasize play, while teaching principles of computer science. We explore this phenomenon based on observations and interviews at a code club in Norway, asking whether coding represents an important skill for children and how it is distributed to include all children. We find that coding through play activity is perceived as teaching more than simply the technical skills of programming. Although the fun aspect draws in children and volunteers, parents and instructors describe the code club as being about learning to understand and control the computer, and digital competence required for achieving success in society. The Code Club is described partly as being a ‘necessity for becoming a good/efficient/empowered citizen in our digital society’, and partly as ‘children are playing with computers anyway’. These arguments have different consequences for the gender imbalance at the Code Club. Our findings suggest that the code clubs need an explicit recruitment strategy targeting girls in order to become an arena where girls can develop interest and competence in digital technologies.

[1]  Douglas Rushkoff,et al.  Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age , 2010 .

[2]  Barbara Crow,et al.  Women, Work and Computing , 2003 .

[3]  Neil Smith,et al.  Educating the Internet-of-Things Generation , 2013, Computer.

[4]  Wendy M. Williams,et al.  Why Aren?t More Women in Computer Science? , 2011, Making Software.

[5]  R. Dini,et al.  History of Sexuality , 2017 .

[6]  Janet Abbate,et al.  Recoding Gender: Women's Changing Participation in Computing , 2012 .

[7]  C. Steele,et al.  Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Neil Smith,et al.  Code club: bringing programming to UK primary schools through scratch , 2014, SIGCSE '14.

[9]  Seymour Papert A Computer Laboratory for Elementary Schools , 1971 .

[10]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Saving Face While Geeking Out: Video Game Testing as a Justification for Learning Computer Science , 2014 .

[11]  C. Hayes 13. Gender Codes , 2010 .

[12]  R. J. Repique Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[13]  V. Lagesen Gender and Technology: From Exclusion to Inclusion? , 2015 .

[14]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Out of the boy's room? A critical analysis of the understanding of gender and ICT in Norway , 2003 .

[15]  Judith Gal-Ezer,et al.  Early computing education , 2014, Inroads.

[16]  J. Cassell,et al.  Chess for girls? Feminism and computer games , 1998 .

[17]  Denise W. Gürer,et al.  Investigating the Incredible Shrinking Pipeline for Women in Computer Science , 2003 .

[18]  Mazliza Othman,et al.  Women in computer science , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Vivian Anette Lagesen,et al.  The Strength of Numbers , 2007 .

[20]  Maria Tamboukou,et al.  Discourse and narrative methods , 2015 .

[21]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[22]  Hilde G. Corneliussen,et al.  Gender-Technology Relations , 2012 .

[23]  Denise E. Agosto Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[25]  Cameron Wilson,et al.  Hour of code , 2014, Inroads.

[26]  Karen Bradley,et al.  A Matter of Degrees: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross-Nationally , 2006 .

[27]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games , 1998 .

[28]  J. Butler Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[29]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Empowering kids to create and share programmable media , 2008, Interactions.

[30]  Nathan Ensmenger,et al.  Making Programming Masculine , 2010 .

[31]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  The Stereotypical Computer Scientist: Gendered Media Representations as a Barrier to Inclusion for Women , 2013 .

[32]  Elisabeth K. Kelan,et al.  Towards a Topology of ‘Doing Gender’: An Analysis of Empirical Research and Its Challenges , 2014 .

[33]  Kiki Prottsman Computer science for the elementary classroom , 2014, INROADS.

[34]  H. Rubin,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data , 1995 .

[35]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[36]  L. Blum,et al.  A Cultural Perspective on Gender Diversity in Computing , 2007 .

[37]  C. Cockburn The circuit of technology Gender, identity and power , 1994 .

[38]  Dorte Marie Søndergaard Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis , 2002 .

[39]  Catherine Hazzard,et al.  Women and information technology , 2001 .

[40]  Michal Armoni Teaching CS in kindergarten: how early can the pipeline begin? , 2012, INROADS.

[41]  Wendy Faulkner,et al.  Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox , 2009 .

[42]  Denise W. Gürer Women in computing history , 2002, SGCS.

[43]  Jennifer S. Light,et al.  When Computers Were Women , 1999 .