Student Interaction with a Computer Tablet Exam Application Replicating the Traditional Paper Exam

The purpose of this study was to develop a computer tablet-based examination application (TabExam) and to explore its potential to replace the traditional paper-based exams. It was completed in digital handwriting with a stylus pen and submitted online for marking and feedback. Comparisons of student exam scores on both the TabExam and a parallel traditional paperbased exam indicated no difference, suggesting that the change in exam mode did not affect academic performance. While students reported that the TabExam had some advantages over paper exams, they had a neutral view on using it as a complete replacement for paper-based exams. More than half of the students accessed the online feedback provided after the TabExam while none of the students requested feedback on their paper exams. In addition to the quantitative data, this paper also provides a students’ perspective into aspects that they perceive as positive or negative, or need improvement, with regards to the use of tablets for examinations.

[1]  Kate J. Garland,et al.  Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: is workload another test mode effect? , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Inexorable and Inevitable: The Continuing Story of Technology and Assessment , 2002 .

[3]  Michelle M. Neumann,et al.  An examination of touch screen tablets and emergent literacy in Australian pre-school children , 2014 .

[4]  Steven Goh,et al.  Wireless tablet PCs for enhanced teaching at an Australian regional university teaching both campus and distance modes , 2013 .

[5]  D. Carless.  Differing perceptions in the feedback process , 2006 .

[6]  Maurizio Manuguerra,et al.  Promoting Student Engagement by Integrating New Technology into Tertiary Education: The Role of the iPad , 2011 .

[7]  Jan McArthur,et al.  No longer exempt from good practice: using exemplars to close the feedback gap for exams , 2013 .

[8]  Kimberle Koile,et al.  Improving learning in CS1 via tablet-PC-based in-class assessment , 2006, ICER '06.

[9]  Masaki Nakagawa,et al.  Exam script analysis from a pen and paper device , 2010, 2010 9th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[10]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Linda A. Murray,et al.  Using digital pens to expedite the marking procedure , 2010 .

[12]  Peter Maclaren,et al.  The new chalkboard: the role of digital pen technologies in tertiary mathematics teaching , 2014 .

[13]  B. Goonan.  Overcoming Test Anxiety: Giving Students the Ability to Show What They Know. , 2003 .

[14]  ra Wright.  The Impact of Technology on Teaching , 2013 .

[15]  Jerrell C. Cassady,et al.  The Influence of Cognitive Test Anxiety across the Learning-Testing Cycle. , 2004 .

[16]  Mark Moran,et al.  Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs and Implications for Educational Institutions , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  Julie E. Dockrell,et al.  The slow handwriting of undergraduate students constrains overall performance in exam essays , 2005 .

[18]  James R. Cox,et al.  Integrating a Single Tablet PC in Chemistry, Engineering, and Physics Courses. , 2008 .

[19]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Technology’s Achilles Heel , 2010 .

[20]  Maarten De Laat,et al.  'Disruptive technologies', 'pedagogical innovation': What's new Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Stephen R. Tate,et al.  Active learning during lecture using tablets , 2014, SIGCSE.

[22]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Examining the Potential for Tablet Use in a Higher Education Context , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[23]  Ken A. Hawick,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction on Touch Screen Tablets for Highly Interactive Computational Simulations , 2012 .

[24]  H. Leeson.  The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerized Testing , 2006 .

[25]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Comparative study of netbooks and tablet PCs for fostering face-to-face collaborative learning , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Richard Anthony Bailey.  Undergraduate students' perceptions the role and utility of written assessment feedback , 2009 .

[27]  Thanos Hatziapostolou,et al.  Enhancing the Impact of Formative Feedback on Student Learning through an Online Feedback System. , 2010 .

[28]  Marissa L. Smith,et al.  Inexpensive Options for a High-Tech Learning Environment , 2011 .

[29]  Alasdair Blair,et al.  What Feedback do Students Want? , 2013 .

[30]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Mastering the Online Summative-Assessment Life Cycle , 2009 .

[31]  S. Salend.  Addressing Test Anxiety , 2011 .

[32]  J. Yonker.  The relationship of deep and surface study approaches on factual and applied test‐bank multiple‐choice question performance , 2011 .

[33]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[34]  M.D. Theys,et al.  Tablet computers and the traditional lecture , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[35]  Amelito G Enriquez,et al.  Enhancing Student Performance Using Tablet Computers , 2010 .

[36]  Jeffrey R. Stowell,et al.  Effects of Online Testing on Student Exam Performance and Test Anxiety , 2010 .

[37]  Aaron Bloomfield.  Evolution of a digital paper exam grading system , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[38]  Samuel N. Kamin,et al.  Measuring increased engagement using tablet PCs in a code review class , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[39]  Yijun Pan,et al.  Precious MeTL: Reflections on the use of Tablet PCs and collaborative interactive software in peer-assisted study sessions , 2012 .

[40]  Dave Berque,et al.  The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-based Technology on Education: Vignettes, Evaluations, and Future Directions , 2006 .

[41]  Andrew Fluck,et al.  Arguing again for e-exams in high stakes examinations , 2013 .

[42]  John T. Fons.  A Year Without Paper: Tablet Computers in the Classroom , 2010 .

[43]  H. Borko,et al.  Wicked Problems and Other Thoughts on Issues of Technology and Teacher Learning , 2009 .

[44]  Suleyman Uludag,et al.  Student perceptions of cheating in online and traditional classes , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[45]  Birgit Loch,et al.  Closing the feedback loop: engaging students in large first-year mathematics test revision sessions using pen-enabled screens , 2013 .

[46]  Nora Mogey,et al.  Typing compared with handwriting for essay examinations at university: letting the students choose , 2010 .

[47]  Christopher Winter,et al.  An investigation into the reasons why students do not collect marked assignments and the accompanying feedback , 2004 .

[48]  Thomas Efferth,et al.  Ten Years’ Experience with an E-Learning Lecture Series on Cancer Biology and Pharmacology , 2013 .

[49]  Enrico Rukzio,et al.  Penbook: bringing pen+paper interaction to a tablet device to facilitate paper-based workflows in the hospital domain , 2013, ITS.

[50]  Dietmar F. Rösner,et al.  E-Assessment as a Service , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[51]  Lori A. Jones.  Using Technology to Support the Grading and Distribution of Written Exam Questions for Large Classes , 2013 .

[52]  George Palaigeorgiou,et al.  Computer based testing using "digital ink": Participatory design of a Tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Juan-Carlos Cano,et al.  On the design of interactive classroom environments based on the Tablet PC technology , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[54]  Chad Anderson,et al.  Tablet computers in support of rural and frontier clinical practice , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.