A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital.

OBJECTIVE To obtain users' views of the new picture archiving and communication system (PACS) from clinical and radiological staff at Hammersmith Hospital, UK. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were used to ascertain the views of staff, following an interview schedule which covered aspects of: (1) their use of PACS, (2) facilities available, (3) the perceived quality of images, (4) reporting, (5) image availability, (6) image accessibility, (7) training, and (8) ease of use of PACS. RESULTS Interviews were carried out with 34 key users and providers of the radiological service at Hammersmith Hospital. Overall, staff were very satisfied with PACS particularly in terms of image availability. All staff said that they preferred PACS to the previous, conventional radiology service. CONCLUSIONS The key implications of issues raised by staff were: the impact of 'down-time' and the importance of an efficient back-up system, the requirement for sufficient short-term storage to prevent images being off-line during clinical situations, the usefulness of the folder system for management of the images, the need to access images for teaching purposes, the advantage of having a default display protocol to facilitate radiological reporting, and the requirement for flexible, yet effective, training to ensure that the system is utilised to its full potential by users.

[1]  G Weatherburn,et al.  Evaluation of diffuse technologies: the case of digital imaging networks. , 1995, Health policy.

[2]  G C Weatherburn,et al.  The effect of PACS on the visualization of the lateral cervical spine and the management of patients presenting with trauma. , 1997, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[3]  L. van Erning,et al.  A view from the Nijmegen PACS project. , 1992, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[4]  M. Buxton,et al.  The benefits of hospital-wide picture archiving and communication systems: a survey of clinical users of radiology services. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  G C Weatherburn,et al.  The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  M J Buxton,et al.  Explaining variation in radiologists' reporting times. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  O Ratib Current views on the functionalities of PACS. , 1992, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[8]  G Weatherburn,et al.  Evaluation of a Hospital Picture Archiving and Communication System , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[9]  M. Buxton,et al.  EXAMINING THE INFLUENCE OF PICTURE ARCHIVING COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND OTHER FACTORS UPON THE LENGTH OF STAY FOR PATIENTS WITH TOTAL HIP AND TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS , 1999, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  D Gur,et al.  Requirements for PACS: users' perspective. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  S Olsson,et al.  User requirements and standards for PACS. 2nd Japan-Nordic PACS Symposium. , 1992, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[12]  G Weatherburn,et al.  Issues in the evaluation of picture archiving and communication systems. , 1995, Health policy.

[13]  M J Buxton,et al.  Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.