Symbol adaptation assessment in outdoor augmented reality

A challenge in presenting augmented reality information, particularly in outdoor environments, is to distinguish the virtual symbols from the background image. In this paper we report on a user study that leverages prior knowledge about adaptations to improve symbol conspicuity by expanding its application to outdoor environments and mobile handheld devices. We considered two types of adaptation that yielded good results indoors, namely adding a border around the symbol and adjusting the colour luminosity, and tested them outdoor in daylight. We also introduced partial and total adaptation modes that differed in the scope of the symbols to adapt: only the ones that are almost imperceptible from the background versus every symbol overlaying the real world image. Results from users' questionnaires reveal that the border adaptation continues to be the favourite regardless of the outdoor lighting conditions, and yet we did not find differences in symbol detection performance in comparison with adjusting colour luminosity. The border adaptation was also considered the best to preserve symbol semantics when combined with the total adaptation mode, thus making it a versatile option for augmented reality applications.

[1]  Samuel S. Silva,et al.  Using color in visualization: A survey , 2011, Comput. Graph..

[2]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Color harmonization for Augmented Reality , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[3]  Kuo-Chen Huang,et al.  Visual Search Performance on an LCD Monitor: Effects of Color Combination of Figure and Icon Background, Shape of Icon, and Line Width of Icon Border , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  Bruce H. Thomas,et al.  ARQuake: an outdoor/indoor augmented reality first person application , 2000, Digest of Papers. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[5]  Sean White,et al.  SiteLens: situated visualization techniques for urban site visits , 2009, CHI.

[6]  Vijanth S. Asirvadam,et al.  Color Space Selection for Color Image Enhancement Applications , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Signal Acquisition and Processing.

[7]  Deborah Hix,et al.  The Effects of Text Drawing Styles, Background Textures, and Natural Lighting on Text Legibility in Outdoor Augmented Reality , 2006, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Mihran Tuceryan,et al.  Automatic determination of text readability over textured backgrounds for augmented reality systems , 2004, Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[9]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human Factors in Engineering and Design , 1957 .

[10]  Maria Beatriz Carmo,et al.  Improving Symbol Salience in Augmented Reality , 2013, GRAPP/IVAPP.

[11]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Eduard Montseny,et al.  Variability estimation of hue and saturation components in the HSV space , 2012 .

[13]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  M.C. Stone,et al.  Representing colors as three numbers [color graphics] , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Comprehensible Visualization for Augmented Reality , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[17]  Annu-Maaria Nivala,et al.  User Aspects of Adaptive Visualization for Mobile Maps , 2007 .

[18]  Deborah Hix,et al.  Active Text Drawing Styles for Outdoor Augmented Reality: A User-Based Study and Design Implications , 2007, 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.