Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging

Ultrasonic molecular imaging employs contrast agents, such as microbubbles, nanoparticles, or liposomes, coated with ligands specific for receptors expressed on cells at sites of angiogenesis, inflammation, or thrombus. Concentration of these highly echogenic contrast agents at a target site enhances the ultrasound signal received from that site, promoting ultrasonic detection and analysis of disease states. In this article, we show that acoustic radiation force can be used to displace targeted contrast agents to a vessel wall, greatly increasing the number of agents binding to available surface receptors. We provide a theoretical evaluation of the magnitude of acoustic radiation force and show that it is possible to displace micron-sized agents physiologically relevant distances. Following this, we show in a series of experiments that acoustic radiation force can enhance the binding of targeted agents: The number of biotinylated microbubbles adherent to a synthetic vessel coated with avidin increases as much as 20-fold when acoustic radiation force is applied; the adhesion of contrast agents targeted to αvβ3 expressed on human umbilical vein endothelial cells increases 27-fold within a mimetic vessel when radiation force is applied; and finally, the image signal-to-noise ratio in a phantom vessel increases up to 25 dB using a combination of radiation force and a targeted contrast agent, over use of a targeted contrast agent alone.

[1]  G. Haar The Acoustic Bubble , 1996 .

[2]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[3]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2001, Current problems in cardiology.

[4]  M. Longo,et al.  Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length , 2002 .

[5]  E. Unger,et al.  In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  P. Dayton,et al.  Changes in the echoes from ultrasonic contrast agents with imaging parameters , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3. , 2003, Circulation.

[8]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  N. Pandian,et al.  Enhanced visualization of intravascular and left atrial appendage thrombus with the use of a thrombus-targeting ultrasonographic contrast agent (MRX-408A1): In vivo experimental echocardiographic studies. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[13]  P J Lund,et al.  Evaluation of new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[14]  S. Simon,et al.  Ultrasonic analysis of peptide- and antibody-targeted microbubble contrast agents for molecular imaging of alphavbeta3-expressing cells. , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[15]  J. Lindner Evolving applications for contrast ultrasound. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  A. Szeri,et al.  Coupled dynamics of translation and collapse of acoustically driven microbubbles. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  S. Slack,et al.  Particle diameter influences adhesion under flow. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[19]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  J. G. Miller,et al.  A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. , 1996, Circulation.

[21]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  O. D. Kellogg Fields of Force , 1967 .

[23]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.