A Theoretical High-Density Nanoscopy Study Leads to the Design of UNLOC, a Parameter-free Algorithm.

Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) enables the production of high-resolution images by imaging spatially isolated fluorescent particles. Although challenging, the result of SMLM analysis lists the position of individual molecules, leading to a valuable quantification of the stoichiometry and spatial organization of molecular actors. Both the signal/noise ratio and the density (Dframe), i.e., the number of fluorescent particles per μm2 per frame, have previously been identified as determining factors for reaching a given SMLM precision. Establishing a comprehensive theoretical study relying on these two parameters is therefore of central interest to delineate the achievable limits for accurate SMLM observations. Our study reports that in absence of prior knowledge of the signal intensity α, the density effect on particle localization is more prominent than that anticipated from theoretical studies performed at known α. A first limit appears when, under a low-density hypothesis (i.e., one-Gaussian fitting hypothesis), any fluorescent particle distant by less than ∼600 nm from the particle of interest biases its localization. In fact, all particles should be accounted for, even those dimly fluorescent, to ascertain unbiased localization of any surrounding particles. Moreover, even under a high-density hypothesis (i.e., multi-Gaussian fitting hypothesis), a second limit arises because of the impossible distinction of particles located too closely. An increase in Dframe is thus likely to deteriorate the localization precision, the image reconstruction, and more generally the quantification accuracy. Our study firstly provides a density-signal/noise ratio space diagram for use as a guide in data recording toward reaching an achievable SMLM resolution. Additionally, it leads to the identification of the essential requirements for implementing UNLOC, a parameter-free and fast computing algorithm approaching the Cramér-Rao bound for particles at high-density per frame and without any prior knowledge of their intensity. UNLOC is available as an ImageJ plugin.

[1]  Steven P. Callahan,et al.  Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy , 2011 .

[2]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[3]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  Unified resolution bounds for conventional and stochastic localization fluorescence microscopy. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Small,et al.  Fluorophore localization algorithms for super-resolution microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[5]  Paul H. Garthwaite,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2002 .

[6]  Satyajit Mayor,et al.  PSF decomposition of nanoscopy images via Bayesian analysis unravels distinct molecular organization of the cell membrane , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Guy M. Hagen,et al.  ThunderSTORM: a comprehensive ImageJ plug-in for PALM and STORM data analysis and super-resolution imaging , 2014, Bioinform..

[8]  Ricardo Henriques,et al.  Fast live-cell conventional fluorophore nanoscopy with ImageJ through super-resolution radial fluctuations , 2016, Nature Communications.

[9]  W. Webb,et al.  Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Hazen P. Babcock,et al.  Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton , 2011, Nature Methods.

[11]  Sjoerd Stallinga,et al.  Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy , 2013, Nature Methods.

[12]  Jerry Chao,et al.  Quantitative study of single molecule location estimation techniques. , 2009, Optics express.

[13]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[14]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics , 1977 .

[15]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[16]  S. T. Smith Statistical resolution limits and the complexified Crame/spl acute/r-Rao bound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  T. Kuner,et al.  Temporal accumulation analysis provides simplified artifact-free analysis of membrane-protein nanoclusters , 2016, Nature Methods.

[18]  R. Hochstrasser,et al.  Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Mike Heilemann,et al.  Art and artifacts in single-molecule localization microscopy: beyond attractive images , 2014, Nature Methods.

[20]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[21]  Talley J. Lambert,et al.  Navigating challenges in the application of superresolution microscopy , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  Claudia Biermann,et al.  Mathematical Methods Of Statistics , 2016 .

[23]  S. Ram,et al.  Localization accuracy in single-molecule microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[24]  O Ruch,et al.  Minimal-complexity segmentation with a polygonal snake adapted to different optical noise models. , 2001, Optics letters.

[25]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Fundamental Limitations on the Resolution of Deterministic Signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[26]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[27]  Sarah Aufmkolk,et al.  Investigating cellular structures at the nanoscale with organic fluorophores. , 2013, Chemistry & biology.

[28]  Chunming Li,et al.  Implicit Active Contours Driven by Local Binary Fitting Energy , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[29]  Keith A. Lidke,et al.  Simultaneous multiple-emitter fitting for single molecule super-resolution imaging , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[30]  Gerhard J Schütz,et al.  Varying label density allows artifact-free analysis of membrane-protein nanoclusters , 2016, Nature Methods.

[31]  Xiaolin Nan,et al.  Methodology for Quantitative Characterization of Fluorophore Photoswitching to Predict Superresolution Microscopy Image Quality , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Yaron M Sigal,et al.  A high-density 3D localization algorithm for stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy , 2012, Optical Nanoscopy.

[33]  S. Hess,et al.  Precisely and accurately localizing single emitters in fluorescence microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[34]  S. Stallinga,et al.  The lateral and axial localization uncertainty in super-resolution light microscopy. , 2014, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[35]  Alex Small,et al.  Multifluorophore localization as a percolation problem: limits to density and precision. , 2016, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  S. Weiss,et al.  Fast, background-free, 3D super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI) , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Faster STORM using compressed sensing , 2012, Nature Methods.

[38]  F Goudail,et al.  Improved robustness of target location in nonhomogeneous backgrounds by use of the maximum-likelihood ratio test location algorithm. , 1999, Optics letters.

[39]  S. Ram,et al.  Ultrahigh accuracy imaging modality for super-localization microscopy , 2013, Nature Methods.

[40]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[41]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  SR-Tesseler: a method to segment and quantify localization-based super-resolution microscopy data , 2015, Nature Methods.

[42]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Statistical deconvolution for superresolution fluorescence microscopy. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[43]  C. R. Rao,et al.  Information and the Accuracy Attainable in the Estimation of Statistical Parameters , 1992 .

[44]  A. Sergé,et al.  Dynamic multiple-target tracing to probe spatiotemporal cartography of cell membranes , 2008, Nature Methods.

[45]  A Radenovic,et al.  Challenges in quantitative single molecule localization microscopy , 2014, FEBS letters.

[46]  Jerry Chao,et al.  Fisher information matrix for branching processes with application to electron-multiplying charge-coupled devices , 2012, Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process..

[47]  S. Holden,et al.  DAOSTORM: an algorithm for high- density super-resolution microscopy , 2011, Nature Methods.

[48]  Yi Sun,et al.  Localization precision of stochastic optical localization nanoscopy using single frames , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[49]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[50]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Imaging below the diffraction limit: a statistical analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[51]  Akihiro Kusumi,et al.  Membrane molecules mobile even after chemical fixation , 2010, Nature Methods.

[52]  Dylan T Burnette,et al.  Bayesian localisation microscopy reveals nanoscale podosome dynamics , 2011, Nature Methods.

[53]  David Baddeley,et al.  Visualization of Localization Microscopy Data , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[54]  Xiaowei Zhuang,et al.  Fast compressed sensing analysis for super-resolution imaging using L1-homotopy. , 2013, Optics express.

[55]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  Turning single-molecule localization microscopy into a quantitative bioanalytical tool , 2017, Nature Protocols.