Modularity of the transcriptional response of protein complexes in yeast.

A comprehensive study is performed on the condition-dependent expression of genes coding for the components of hand curated multi-protein complexes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in order to identify coherent transcriptional modules within these complexes. Such modules are defined as groups of genes within complexes whose expression profiles under a common set of experimental conditions allow us to discriminate them from random sets of genes. Our analysis reveals that complexes such as the cytoplasmic ribosome, the proteasome and the respiration chain complexes previously characterized as "stable" or "permanent" represent transcriptional modules that are coherently up or down-regulated in many different conditions. Overall however, some level of coherent expression is detected only in 71 out of the total of 113 complexes with at least five different protein components that could be reliably analyzed. Of these, 26 behave as coherently expressed transcriptional modules encompassing all the components of the complex. In another 15, at least half of the components make up such modules and in ten, few or no modules are detected. In an additional 20 complexes coherent expression is detected, but in too few conditions to enable reliable module detection. Interestingly, the transcriptional modules, when detected, often correspond to one or more known sub-complexes with specific functions. Furthermore, detected modules are generally consistent with transcriptional modules identified on the basis of predicted cis-regulatory sequence motifs. Also, groups of genes shared between complexes that carry out related functions tend to be part of overlapping transcriptional modules identified in these complexes. Together these findings suggest that transcriptional modules may represent basic functional and evolutionary building blocs of protein complexes.

[1]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[2]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  Conservation of gene co-regulation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[4]  S. Wodak,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes in yeast , 2004, Genome Biology.

[5]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[6]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[7]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Bioinform..

[9]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Applied Discriminant Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  T. Hughes,et al.  High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[11]  G. Church,et al.  Computational identification of cis-regulatory elements associated with groups of functionally related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  P. Bork,et al.  Dynamic Complex Formation During the Yeast Cell Cycle , 2005, Science.

[13]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  Combining pattern discovery and discriminant analysis to predict gene co-regulation , 2004, Bioinform..

[14]  R. Duden ER-to-Golgi transport: COP I and COP II function (Review) , 2003, Molecular membrane biology.

[15]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. , 2002, Genome research.

[17]  Jan Ihmels,et al.  Principles of transcriptional control in the metabolic network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[19]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[20]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  E. Sztul,et al.  ER to Golgi Transport: Requirement for P115 at a Pre-Golgi Vtc Stage , 1999 .

[22]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[23]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  GenePro: a cytoscape plug-in for advanced visualization and analysis of interaction networks , 2006, Bioinform..

[24]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome , 2004, Nature.

[25]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[26]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Networks Network Motifs : Simple Building Blocks of Complex , 2002 .

[27]  Xin Chen,et al.  TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[29]  John D. Storey,et al.  Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[31]  David Botstein,et al.  SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..