Environmental and economic assessment of the Inbicon lignocellulosic ethanol technology

Inbicon’s lignocellulose-to-bioethanol technology is assessed in terms of its environmental and economic performance within this article. This is done under various scenarios to identify the influence of locations, raw materials and plant setups on the results. In all scenarios the specific GHG emissions of the bioethanol production are 50% below those of the fossil reference fuel, some scenarios even reach a GHG mitigation of over 60%. In many scenarios specific production costs are reached that are in the range or below those of conventional bioethanol today. But low emissions and low costs remain contradictory targets to a great extent. However, using C5 sugars in co-fermentation to produce bioethanol and the also generated biogas as an internal heat source seems to be a good compromise and leads to both relatively low costs of 27.2EURGJ−1 and low emissions of 28.3kgCO2-eq.GJ−1.

[1]  B. Bruggen,et al.  Critical analysis of techno-economic estimates for the production cost of lignocellulosic bio-ethanol , 2013 .

[2]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[3]  Stefan Majer,et al.  Integrated assessment of sustainable cereal straw potential and different straw-based energy applications in Germany , 2014 .

[4]  Andrew J. McAloon,et al.  Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: an experience curve approach , 2009 .

[5]  P. Pawelzik,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts of cellulosic ethanol using life cycle assessment with technological advances over time , 2012 .

[6]  N. Scarlat,et al.  Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use. , 2010, Waste management.

[7]  F. Müller‐Langer,et al.  Benchmarking biofuels—a comparison of technical, economic and environmental indicators , 2014 .

[8]  Arturo Sánchez,et al.  Analysis of historical total production costs of cellulosic ethanol and forecasting for the 2020-decade , 2014 .

[9]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover , 2010 .

[10]  Arturo Sánchez,et al.  Parametric analysis of total costs and energy efficiency of 2G enzymatic ethanol production , 2013 .

[11]  Jan Larsen,et al.  Inbicon makes lignocellulosic ethanol a commercial reality , 2012 .

[12]  Helmut Döhler,et al.  Faustzahlen für die Landwirtschaft , 2009 .

[13]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Ethanol production in biorefineries using lignocellulosic feedstock - GHG performance, energy balance and implications of life cycle calculation methodology. , 2014 .

[14]  Kuratorium fur Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft Darmstadt Cooperation in livestock farming. A discussion from the KTBL. , 1980 .

[15]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2011 .

[16]  Edwards Robert,et al.  Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Power Trains in the European Context - Report, Version 3c , 2011 .

[17]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach , 2004 .