The principal judgmental components of multiattribute decision making are examined here with specific reference to how these components can be captured electronically. Once captured, a function, rule, or algorithm may be executed for the integration of this information and the selection of the optimal alternative(s). Two kinds of algorithms are discussed: one based on linear models, the other on fuzzy-set theory and ratio scaling. With on-line support and certain assumptions about human biases (which lead to nonoptimal decisions), the quality of decisions can be enhanced considerably. The principal concerns are with end-user acceptance of computer augmented decisions.
[1]
T. L. Saaty.
A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures
,
1977
.
[2]
Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
,
1974,
Science.
[3]
Ronald R. Yager,et al.
Multiple objective decision-making using fuzzy sets
,
1977
.
[4]
L. Zadeh.
A Fuzzy-Set-Theoretic Interpretation of Linguistic Hedges
,
1972
.
[5]
R. Dawes,et al.
Linear models in decision making.
,
1974
.
[6]
B. Fischhoff,et al.
Behavioral Decision Theory
,
1977
.
[7]
Paul Slovic,et al.
Toward understanding and improving decisions
,
1982
.