Dynamic Conflict Management in Large-Scale Design and Construction Projects

The construction industry plays a major role in both the economy and infrastructure project delivery worldwide. However, one major critical characteristic of the construction industry is the high cost incurred by the resolution of arising conflicts in projects. As a result, project managers are seeking ways to avoid conflicts and resolve them effectively and equitably when they happen. This paper discusses the dynamic nature of conflicts in terms of their evolution and escalation within a project and the interaction between conflicts and dispute avoidance and resolution techniques (DART). The paper also presents the background and development of a conflict management system, entitled the DART Simulator (DART-S). The intent of the DART-S is to provide project managers with a comprehensive and integrated approach to evaluate the impact of a DART implementation on the reduction of conflicts. The simulator was built using a system dynamic modeling within a visual simulation environment. The core of the simulator was developed by using data from literature on the nature of conflicts, dispute resolution processes, and the potential effectiveness of 46 different DART-S on conflict avoidance and resolution. The simulator was then tested and verified with a case study comparing the traditional two-step dispute resolution process with a five-step dispute resolution process. The results of this comparison clearly show that the five-step dispute resolution process is able to decrease the initial number of conflicts of a project, reduce the number of conflicts which may escalate to a higher step in the resolution process, and provide resolutions of conflicts before they reach litigation. By quantifying the amount of conflicts, evaluating the evolution of conflicts, and assessing the impact of DART implementation on conflict escalation, the DART-S provides project managers with an integrated strategy for conflict management.

[1]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Model for Understanding, Preventing, and Resolving Project Disputes , 2001 .

[2]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction , 2002 .

[3]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Construction Claims and Disputes: Causes and Cost/Time Overruns , 1994 .

[4]  Chris C.S. Lau,et al.  Overcast sky conditions and luminance distribution in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[5]  D A Vlatas.  Owner and contractor review to reduce claims , 1986 .

[6]  R. Craig,et al.  Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management in Construction , 1999 .

[7]  Michael C. Vorster,et al.  Innovations to Manage Disputes: DRB and NEC , 2000 .

[8]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[9]  Tracy Y. Robar.  Communication and Career Advancement , 1998 .

[10]  Peter Fenn,et al.  Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management in Construction : An International Perspective , 2005 .

[11]  Henry L. Michel.  THE NEXT 25 YEARS: THE FUTURE OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 1998 .

[12]  D. Sean McCone,et al.  Introduction to construction dispute resolution , 2003 .

[13]  Seung Heon Han,et al.  Lessons learned from rigid conflict resolution in an organization: Construction conflict case study , 2003 .

[14]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice Motive in Social Behavior , 1981 .

[15]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[16]  David W. Miller,et al.  BEYOND ADR: WORKING TOWARD SYNERGISTIC STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP , 1995 .

[17]  David Lowe,et al.  Conflict and dispute in construction , 1997 .

[18]  Thomas J. Stipanowich.  Beyond Arbitration: Innovation and Evolution in the United States Construction Industry , 1996 .

[19]  Virginia Fairweather,et al.  Construction Claims: Prevention and Resolution, 2nd Ed. , 1993 .

[20]  Sammie D. Guy,et al.  Construction Claims: Prevention and resolution , 1992 .

[21]  Frederick D. Lazar,et al.  Project Partnering: Improving the Likelihood of Win/Win Outcomes , 2000 .

[22]  Robert A. Rubin,et al.  ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN U.S. PUBLIC WORKS: PROPOSED MODEL , 2003 .

[23]  Robert A. Rubin,et al.  Construction Law and Practice in Japan , 1988 .

[24]  Robert K. Cox.  Managing Change Orders and Claims , 1997 .

[25]  Thamhaim Hj,et al.  Conflict management in project life cycles. , 1975, Sloan management review.

[26]  Kathleen M. J. Harmon,et al.  Resolution of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies , 2003 .

[27]  Thomas B. Treacy.  USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 1995 .

[28]  Onur Behzat Tokdemir,et al.  Predicting the Outcome of Construction Litigation Using Neural Networks , 1998 .

[29]  James J. Adrian.  Construction Claims: A Quantitative Approach , 1988 .

[30]  J. Forrester.  Principles of systems : text and workbook, chapters 1 through 10 , 1968 .

[31]  Z. Irani,et al.  Strategic alliances: a model for establishing long-term commitment to inter-organizational relations in construction , 2004 .

[32]  Robert Frank Cushman,et al.  Alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry , 1991 .

[33]  Carlos E. Sosa.  State of the art review of methodologies for dispute avoidance and resolution in large scale engineering systems , 1999 .

[34]  Steve R. Sanders,et al.  PEER-REVIEWED PAPER:Partnering Continuum , 1998 .

[35]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  Managing Unforeseen Site Conditions , 1987 .