Abstract Deep mixed column (DMC) is known as one of the effective methods for stabilizing the natural earth beneath road or railway embankments to control stability and settlements under traffic loads. The load distribution mechanism of embankment overlying on loose subgrades stabilized with DMCs considerably depends on the columns' mechanical and geometrical specifications. The present study uses the laboratory investigation to understand the behavior of embankments lying on loose sandy subgrade in three different conditions: (1) subgrade without reinforcement, (2) subgrade reinforced with DMCs in a triangular pattern and horizontal plan, and (3) subgrade reinforced with DMCs in a square pattern and horizontal plan. For this purpose, by adopting the scale factor of 1:10, a reference embankment with 20 cm height, 250 cm length, and 93% maximum dry density achieved in standard Proctor compaction test was constructed over a 70 cm thick loose sandy bed with the relative density of 50% in a loading chamber, and its load-displacement behavior was evaluated until the failure occurred. In the next two tests, DMCs (with 10 cm diameter, 40 cm length, and 25 cm center-to-center spacing) were placed in groups in two different patterns (square and triangular) in the same sandy bed beneath the embankment and, consequently, the embankments were constructed over the reinforced subgrades and gradually loaded until the failure happened. In all the three tests, the load-displacement behaviors of the embankment and the selected DMCs were instrumented for monitoring purpose. The obtained results implied 64% increase in failure load and 40% decrease in embankment crest settlement when using the square pattern of DMCs compared with those of the reference embankment, while these values were 63% and 12%, respectively, for DMCs in triangular pattern. This confirmed generally better performance of DMCs with a triangular pattern.
[1]
Anand J. Puppala,et al.
Field Investigations on Performance of T-Shaped Deep Mixed Soil Cement Column–Supported Embankments over Soft Ground
,
2012
.
[2]
Aw Drews,et al.
Standard Test Method for Analysis of
,
1998
.
[3]
Zhang Man,et al.
Deep Mixing Method
,
2000
.
[4]
Hamid Khajehei,et al.
Evaluation of Deep Soil Mixing Efficiency in Stabilizing Loose Sandy Soils Using Laboratory Tests
,
2014
.
[5]
Ali Porbaha,et al.
Two and Three-Dimensional Modeling of DM Columns under Embankments
,
2006
.
[6]
S. Nazarian,et al.
Deep Soil Mixing Technology for Mitigation of Pavement Roughness
,
2008
.
[7]
Mats Olsson,et al.
Some experiences from full-scale test embankments founded on floating lime-cement columns
,
2008
.
[8]
Arul Arulrajah,et al.
Ground treatment using dry deep soil mixing for railway embankments in Malaysia
,
2003
.
[9]
Ernest T. Selig,et al.
Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management
,
1995
.
[10]
Masaaki Terashi,et al.
The Deep Mixing Method
,
2013
.