Water Electrified Sprays for Emission Control in Energy Production Processes

Energy generation by fossil fuels produces significant amount of pollutants. Among the most toxic of them, there are SO2 and particulate matter. The first is a toxic gas that is subjected to severe regulations, the second is only partially regulated since the most toxic fractions of particles, i.e. the ultrafine particles, are nor easily measured neither properly captured by conventional technologies available at commercial level. Electrification of water sprays provide a reliable way to improve both the SO2 mass transfer rates and the particle capture efficiency, thanks to the multiple effects of electric charges imposed on the sprayed droplets. In this paper, we report experimental findings on the use of electrified sprays of water to reduce SO2 and particulate matter form a model flue gas. Tests were performed both laboratory and pilot scale. The experiments are compared with the performances of the same spray operated without electrification. In the pilot scale unit, particle removal efficiency is negligible and SO2 removal is up to 97% with the uncharged spray, The use of induction charging and exposure to corona pre-charging allow achieving >93% reduction of particulate matter and to >99% SO2 reductions. Experiments at laboratory scale shed light on the mechanisms of particle and SO2 capture. In particular, the experimental results revealed that a stochastic scavenging model presented in our former works (data not shown) well described the particle capture and that for charged droplets, the absorption rate for SO2 improved by about 60% respect to uncharged droplets.

[1]  A. Lancia,et al.  Enhanced SO2 removal by using charged water droplets , 2016 .

[2]  A. Lancia,et al.  Effect of gas temperature on the capture of charged particles by oppositely charged water droplets , 2016 .

[3]  Francesco Di Natale,et al.  Particulate matter in marine diesel engines exhausts: Emissions and control strategies , 2015 .

[4]  Anatol Jaworek,et al.  Capture of fine and ultrafine particles in a wet electrostatic scrubber , 2015 .

[5]  Wamadeva Balachandran,et al.  Experimental analysis on the capture of submicron particles (PM0.5) by wet electrostatic scrubbing , 2014 .

[6]  R. Balasubramanian,et al.  Physicochemical and toxicological characteristics of particulate matter emitted from a non-road diesel engine: comparative evaluation of biodiesel-diesel and butanol-diesel blends. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Wamadeva Balachandran,et al.  A lab-scale system to study submicron particles removal in wet electrostatic scrubbers , 2013 .

[8]  Maysam F. Abbod,et al.  New Technologies for Marine Diesel Engine Emission Control , 2013 .

[9]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[10]  Wamadeva Balachandran,et al.  Submicron particles removal by charged sprays. Fundamentals , 2013 .

[11]  Len Levy,et al.  Does carbon black disaggregate in lung fluid? A critical assessment. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[12]  Anthony S Wexler,et al.  Susceptibility to inhaled flame-generated ultrafine soot in neonatal and adult rat lungs. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  Rex Britter,et al.  Dynamics and dispersion modelling of nanoparticles from road traffic in the urban atmospheric environment—A review , 2011 .

[14]  Stéphane Popinet,et al.  A charge-conservative approach for simulating electrohydrodynamic two-phase flows using volume-of-fluid , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  R. Britter,et al.  A review of the characteristics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere and the prospects for developing regulatory controls , 2010 .

[16]  Francesco Di Natale,et al.  Wet electrostatic scrubbers for the abatement of submicronic particulate , 2010 .

[17]  Hirotsugu Fujita,et al.  Enhancement of diesel particulate matter collection in an electrostatic water-spraying scrubber , 2010 .

[18]  Jungho Hwang,et al.  Flue Gas Desulfurization with an Electrostatic Spraying Absorber , 2008 .

[19]  T. Tetley,et al.  Health effects of nanomaterials. , 2007, Biochemical Society transactions.

[20]  T. Czech,et al.  Modern electrostatic devices and methods for exhaust gas cleaning: A brief review , 2007 .

[21]  Marcin Lackowski,et al.  Wet electroscrubbers for state of the art gas cleaning. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  J. Kulon,et al.  Multi-nozzle electrospray system for gas cleaning processes , 2006 .

[23]  Barry Dellinger,et al.  Origin and Health Impacts of Emissions of Toxic By-Products and Fine Particles from Combustion and Thermal Treatment of Hazardous Wastes and Materials , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  NANOPARTICLE AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: AN OVERVIEW , 2005 .

[25]  J. Kulon,et al.  Efficiency of smoke removal by charged water droplets , 2003 .

[26]  Andrei Bologa,et al.  Electrostatic charging of aerosol as a mechanism of gas cleaning from submicron particles : Filtech Europa 2001 , 2001 .

[27]  H. C. Simpson Bubbles, drops and particles , 1980 .

[28]  Giorgio Martini,et al.  Particle Number Emissions During Regeneration of DPF-equipped Light Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2011 .

[29]  Zhentao Wang,et al.  Model and Simulation on SO 2 Removal with Electrostatic Spray , 2011 .

[30]  M. J. Matteson,et al.  Mass transfer of sulfur dioxide to growing droplets. Role of surface electrical properties , 1974 .