A Three-Stage Decision Model Integrating FAHP, MDS and Association Rules for Targeting Smartphone Customers

Human living consists of a series of decision making that involves a lot of decision objectives and factors. Decision makers would be concerned with the best selection among different alternatives. In this study, we propose a three-stage decision making model combining with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process FAHP, Multidimensional Scaling MDS and Association Rules AR. The proposed model enables decision makers to find out the importance of each decision criterion and select the optimal alternative for solving decision problems. We applied the proposed model to understand the consumer's evaluation factors in their smartphone purchasing. In stage I, the FAHP analysis results indicate the decision criteria as follows. When customers intend to buy a smartphone, the order of importance of their decision criteria is as follows: display size, thickness, and hardware efficiency. Further, in stage II, several interesting AR analysis rules reveal that consumers of high self-glory would consider the hardware efficiency and the pixel of lens of the product when they purchase a smartphone. Finally, through the perceptual map of MDS in stage III, we can classify consumers into four groups, namely, "students", "IT professionals", "house brokers and bankers & insurers", and "teachers and healthcare workers". Customers in the same group have similar evaluation criteria in their smartphone purchasing. The integrated decision model proposed in this study can help the suppliers in making right marketing strategies for different consumer groups, and can also be applied in various fields for decision marking in the future.

[1]  N. Mahdavi-Amiri,et al.  A Heuristic Methodology for Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Web-Based E-Learning Systems Based on User Satisfaction , 2008 .

[2]  V. Belton,et al.  The legitimacy of rank reversal—A comment , 1985 .

[3]  Jie Zhao,et al.  Research on the Application of Improved Association Rule Algorithm in Supply Chain Management , 2010 .

[4]  Jaap Spronk,et al.  The Relevance of Mcdm for Financial Decisions , 2002 .

[5]  Songchun Moon,et al.  Utility-based association rule mining: A marketing solution for cross-selling , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION FOR STRATEGIES OF IMPROVING AND CONTROLLING AIR-QUALITY IN THE SUPER CITY - A CASE-STUDY OF TAIPEI CITY , 1994 .

[7]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[8]  W. Torgerson Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method , 1952 .

[9]  E. Aronson,et al.  Theory and method , 1985 .

[10]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[11]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  G. Tzeng,et al.  Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach , 2005 .

[13]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  AHP, Fuzzy Measure and Fuzzy Integral Approaches for the Appraisal of Information Service Providers in Taiwan , 2003 .

[14]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Bernard Kamsu-Foguem,et al.  Mining association rules for the quality improvement of the production process , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Jih-Jeng Huang,et al.  Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  P. Harker,et al.  Globally effective questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[18]  Y. Takane,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling I , 2015 .

[19]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[20]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[21]  Muhittin Oral,et al.  A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects , 1991 .

[22]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .