Imitative Attacker Deception in Stackelberg Security Games
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Milind Tambe,et al. Three Strategies to Success: Learning Adversary Models in Security Games , 2016, IJCAI.
[2] Ariel D. Procaccia,et al. Learning Optimal Commitment to Overcome Insecurity , 2014, NIPS.
[3] Maria-Florina Balcan,et al. Commitment Without Regrets: Online Learning in Stackelberg Security Games , 2015, EC.
[4] Nicholas R. Jennings,et al. Playing Repeated Security Games with No Prior Knowledge , 2016, AAMAS.
[5] Milind Tambe,et al. Taking It for a Test Drive: A Hybrid Spatio-Temporal Model for Wildlife Poaching Prediction Evaluated Through a Controlled Field Test , 2017, ECML/PKDD.
[6] Haifeng Xu,et al. Information Disclosure as a Means to Security , 2015, AAMAS.
[7] Hans D. Schotten,et al. Demystifying Deception Technology: A Survey , 2018, ArXiv.
[8] Vincent Conitzer,et al. Learning and Approximating the Optimal Strategy to Commit To , 2009, SAGT.
[9] Vincent Conitzer,et al. Stackelberg vs. Nash in security games: interchangeability, equivalence, and uniqueness , 2010, AAMAS.
[10] Tobias Scheffer,et al. Static prediction games for adversarial learning problems , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[11] Gerald Tesauro,et al. Playing repeated Stackelberg games with unknown opponents , 2012, AAMAS.
[12] Thomas G. Dietterich. What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.
[13] Tobias Scheffer,et al. Stackelberg games for adversarial prediction problems , 2011, KDD.
[14] Milind Tambe,et al. CAPTURE: A New Predictive Anti-Poaching Tool for Wildlife Protection , 2016, AAMAS.
[15] Branislav Bosanský,et al. Comparing Strategic Secrecy and Stackelberg Commitment in Security Games , 2017, IJCAI.
[16] Milind Tambe,et al. Cloudy with a Chance of Poaching: Adversary Behavior Modeling and Forecasting with Real-World Poaching Data , 2017, AAMAS.
[17] Yongzhao Wang,et al. Deception in Finitely Repeated Security Games , 2019, AAAI.
[18] Michael I. Jordan,et al. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .