Single and double-layer honeycomb sandwich panels under impact loading

Abstract Honeycomb sandwich structures have excellent energy absorption capabilities, combined with good mechanical properties and low density. These characteristics make them ideal for the transportation industry, which has a growing interest in reaching higher safety standards. The purpose of the present paper is the introduction of lightweight and more efficient crashworthy structures. Double-layer honeycomb sandwich structures were analysed and their energy absorption capabilities were evaluated by means of low-velocity impact tests. The specific energy absorption of double-layer panels was compared to single-layer honeycomb and other lightweight panels, in order to assess the effectiveness and the convenience of the introduced solution for lightweight and crashworthy devices. The impact absorption mechanism was evaluated through Computed Tomography images and visual inspection. A theoretical evaluation was applied to investigate the mono-layer impact response. The results were compared to those obtained with different boundary conditions and with a full-scale test. Contact parameters were influenced by boundary conditions since they depend on the specimens stiffness. Double-layer panels displayed a progressive collapse sequence, depending on the core arrangement and on the cell size. Honeycomb with larger cell size showed a better distribution of the impact loading which generated an almost uniform compression of the core. Such observations suggested the possibility to obtain energy absorber devices with a controlled deformation. Preliminary considerations on the existence of a size effect were drawn, since it was observed a relation among the contact parameters and the geometrical characteristics of the honeycomb and the indenter.

[1]  Gin Boay Chai,et al.  Low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels , 2008 .

[2]  Hui Li,et al.  Design and Simulation of Ship Protection Structures , 2015 .

[3]  G. Epasto,et al.  Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading , 2012 .

[4]  Wesley J. Cantwell,et al.  The low velocity impact response of an aluminium honeycomb sandwich structure , 2003 .

[5]  Serge Abrate,et al.  Localized Impact on Sandwich Structures With Laminated Facings , 1997 .

[6]  Kwang Bok Shin,et al.  An experimental study of low-velocity impact responses of sandwich panels for Korean low floor bus , 2008 .

[7]  Mustafa Güden,et al.  The impact responses and the finite element modeling of layered trapezoidal corrugated aluminum core and aluminum sheet interlayer sandwich structures , 2013 .

[8]  Yong Chen,et al.  Crush dynamics of square honeycomb thin rubber wall , 2009 .

[9]  Gerald Nurick,et al.  Some theoretical considerations on the dynamic response of sandwich structures under impulsive loading , 2010 .

[10]  Wesley J. Cantwell,et al.  The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures , 2002 .

[11]  Zongquan Deng,et al.  Crashworthiness design optimisation of metal honeycomb energy absorber used in lunar lander , 2011 .

[12]  M. Güden,et al.  Single- and double-layer aluminum corrugated core sandwiches under quasi-static and dynamic loadings , 2016 .

[13]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[14]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs. foam , 2013 .

[15]  Yoshiaki Yasui,et al.  Dynamic axial crushing of multi-layer honeycomb panels and impact tensile behavior of the component members , 2000 .

[16]  G. Epasto,et al.  Aluminum honeycomb sandwich for protective structures of earth moving machines , 2018 .

[17]  A. Milani,et al.  Micro-XCT analysis of damage mechanisms in 3D circular braided composite tubes under transverse impact , 2018 .

[18]  M. Schraad,et al.  ONSET OF FAILURE IN ALUMINUM HONEYCOMBS UNDER GENERAL IN-PLANE LOADING , 1998 .

[19]  David Hui,et al.  Mechanical behavior of composited structure filled with tandem honeycombs , 2017 .

[20]  Jamshid Fazilati,et al.  Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of multi-layer honeycomb energy absorber panels under axial impact , 2016 .

[21]  Jianguang Fang,et al.  On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art , 2017 .

[22]  J. Nunes,et al.  Sandwiched composites in aerospace engineering , 2016 .

[23]  G. Minak,et al.  Influence of diameter and boundary conditions on low velocity impact response of CFRP circular laminated plates , 2008 .

[24]  Serge Abrate,et al.  Impact on Composite Structures , 1998 .

[25]  Kaleonui J. Hui,et al.  Disbond detection in a composite honeycomb structure of an aircraft vertical stabilizer by fiber Bragg gratings detecting guided ultrasound waves , 2017 .

[26]  G. Epasto,et al.  Theoretical and experimental analysis for the impact response of glass fibre reinforced aluminium honeycomb sandwiches , 2018 .

[27]  T. Reddy,et al.  Deformation and impact energy absorption of cellular sandwich panels , 2014 .

[28]  David Hui,et al.  Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels , 2017 .

[29]  Jakob Kuttenkeuler,et al.  On structural design of energy efficient small high-speed craft , 2011 .

[30]  T. Yi.  Mechanical properties of a hierarchical honeycomb with sandwich walls , 2016 .

[31]  Z. Azari,et al.  Experimental study on the fatigue behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels with artificial defects , 2015 .

[32]  Kunigal N. Shivakumar,et al.  Prediction of Impact Force and Duration Due to Low-Velocity Impact on Circular Composite Laminates , 1985 .

[33]  S. McKown,et al.  Drop weight impact behaviour of sandwich panels with metallic micro lattice cores , 2013 .

[34]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Finite element model and validation of a surrogate crash test vehicle for impacts with roadside objects , 1997 .

[35]  L. Sutherland.  A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part II – Impact event and material parameters , 2018 .

[36]  Han Zhao,et al.  An experimental study on the impact behavior of multilayer sandwich with corrugated cores , 2017 .

[37]  Xin Li,et al.  Sandwich panels with layered graded aluminum honeycomb cores under blast loading , 2017 .

[38]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  Computed tomography analysis of impact response of lightweight sandwich panels with micro lattice core , 2018 .

[39]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  Computed tomography-based reconstruction and finite element modelling of honeycomb sandwiches under low-velocity impacts , 2014 .

[40]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  Prediction model for the impact response of glass fibre reinforced aluminium foam sandwiches , 2015 .