Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill

OBJECTIVE Bone sawing or cutting is widely used for bone removal processes in bone surgery. It is an essential skill that surgeons should execute with a high level of experience and sensitive force perception. Surgical training simulators, with virtual and haptic feedback functions, can offer a safe, repeatable and cost-effective alternative to traditional surgeries. In this research, we developed a surgical training simulator with virtual and haptic force feedback for maxillofacial surgery, and we validated the effects on the learning of bone-sawing skills through empirical evaluation. METHODS Omega.6 from Force Dimension was employed as the haptic device, and Display300 from SenseGraphices was used as the 3D stereo display. The voxel-based model was constructed using computed tomography (CT) images, and the virtual tools were built through reverse engineering. The multi-point collision detection method was applied for haptic rendering to test the 3D relationship between the virtual tool and the bone voxels. Bone-sawing procedures in maxillofacial surgery were simulated with a virtual environment and real-time haptic feedback. A total of 25 participants (16 novices and 9 experienced surgeons) were included in 2 groups to perform the bone-sawing simulation for assessing the construct validity. Each of the participants completed the same bone-sawing procedure at the predefined maxillary region six times. For each trial, the sawing operative time, the maximal acceleration, and the percentage of the haptic force exceeding the threshold were recorded and analysed to evaluate the validity. After six trials, all of the participants scored the simulator in terms of safe force learning, stable hand control and overall performance to confirm the face validity. Moreover, 10 novices in 2 groups indentified the transfer validity on rapid prototype skull models by comparing the operative time and the maximal acceleration. RESULTS The analysed results of construct validity showed that the two groups significantly reduced their sawing operative times after six trials. Regarding maximal acceleration, the curve significantly descended and reached a plateau after the fifth repetition (novices) or third repetition (surgeons). Regarding safe haptic force, the novices obviously reduced the percentage of the haptic force exceeding the threshold, with statistical significance after four trials, but the surgeons did not show a significant difference. Moreover, the subjectively scored results demonstrated that the proposed simulator was more helpful for the novices than for the experienced surgeons, with scores of 8.31 and 7.22, respectively, for their overall performance. The experimental results on skill transference showed that the experimental group performed bone-sawing operation in lower maximal acceleration than control group with a significant difference (p<0.05). These findings suggested that the simulator training had positive effects on real sawing. CONCLUSIONS The evaluation results proved the construct validity, face validity and the transfer validity of the simulator. These results indicated that this simulator was able to produce the effect of learning bone-sawing skill, and it could provide a training alternative for novices.

[1]  Jan Wikander,et al.  Face Validity Tests of a Haptic Bone Milling Surgery Simulator Prototype , 2012 .

[2]  Ming Dar Tsai,et al.  AN AMPUTATION SIMULATOR WITH BONE SAWING HAPTIC INTERACTION , 2006 .

[3]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Visuohaptic simulation of bone surgery for training and evaluation , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Force Skill Learning , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[5]  Nigel W. John,et al.  The Role of Haptics in Medical Training Simulators: A Survey of the State of the Art , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[6]  José Manuel Fernández-Arroyo,et al.  A Global Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Virtual Reality Medical Simulators , 2011 .

[7]  Gregor Kennedy,et al.  Validation of a Networked Virtual Reality Simulation of Temporal Bone Surgery , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  Tania Gottschalk,et al.  The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  Ge Yu,et al.  VOXEL-BASED INTERACTIVE HAPTIC SIMULATION OF DENTAL DRILLING , 2009 .

[10]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Simulation for the Operating Room: Proficiency-Based Training as a Paradigm Shift in Surgical Skills Training , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Shinichi Yamada,et al.  Application of virtual reality force feedback haptic device for oral implant surgery. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  Ming-Dar Tsai,et al.  Bone drilling haptic interaction for orthopedic surgical simulator , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[13]  M G Melkonian,et al.  Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Physics-Based Haptic Simulation of Bone Machining , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[15]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems , 1995 .

[16]  Jing Qin,et al.  Impulse-Based Rendering Methods for Haptic Simulation of Bone-Burring. , 2012, IEEE transactions on haptics.

[17]  Koray K. Safak,et al.  VISUALISATION OF BURRING OPERATION IN VIRTUAL SURGERY SIMULATION , 2010 .

[18]  Ming-Dar Tsai,et al.  Accurate Visual and Haptic Burring Surgery Simulation Based on a Volumetric Model , 2009 .

[19]  Mithra Vankipuram,et al.  A virtual reality simulator for orthopedic basic skills: A design and validation study , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[20]  E. I. Konukseven,et al.  Development of a visio-haptic integrated dental training simulation system. , 2010, Journal of dental education.

[21]  Karl Heinz Höhne,et al.  Haptic volume interaction with anatomic models at sub-voxel resolution , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[22]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  Toward Stable and Realistic Haptic Interaction for Tooth Preparation Simulation , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[23]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[24]  Adam Dubrowski,et al.  Teaching Surgical Skills: What Kind of Practice Makes Perfect?: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[25]  M. Schijven,et al.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[26]  Arjana Davidescu,et al.  Towards a Virtual Reality Simulator for Orthognathic Basic Skils , 2012 .

[27]  Shih-Tseng Lee,et al.  Development of an Augmented Reality Force Feedback Virtual Surgery Training Platform , 2011 .

[28]  Lindsay O. Long,et al.  Objective differentiation of force-based laparoscopic skills using a novel haptic simulator. , 2012, Journal of surgical education.

[29]  Ara Darzi,et al.  The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[30]  Pheng-Ann Heng,et al.  Real-Time Mandibular Angle Reduction Surgical Simulation With Haptic Rendering , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.