Determinants of CO2 emissions in Brazil and Russia between 1992 and 2011: A decomposition analysis

This paper deals with the decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Brazil and Russia from 1992 to 2011. The refined Laspeyres index (RLI) method applied and both aggregated and sectoral changes in CO2 emissions decomposed. Brazil’s and Russia’s economies divided into three economic sectors including agriculture, industry and services. Impact of four main factors, such as economic activity, employment, energy intensity, and carbon intensity in CO2 emissions changes were analyzed. The aggregated decomposition analysis revealed that Brazil is still far from a decoupling between economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions where Russia achieved a substantial decline in carbon emissions mainly due to the improved energy intensity. The empirical findings of sectoral decomposition analysis emphasized that the economic activity was the major CO2 increasing factor in Brazil’s economic sectors. On the other hand the economic activity effect followed a reducing impact in Russia’s sectoral emissions until 2000. The structural changes between sectors and their impacts on CO2 emissions were captured by employment effect. Energy intensity and carbon intensity effects underlined that environmental sustainability widely neglected in Brazil and Russia during the study period. The results yield important hints for energy planning and sustainable environment.

[1]  A. Barros,et al.  Recent trends in maternal, newborn, and child health in Brazil: progress toward Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[2]  D. Stern,et al.  China's Changing Energy Intensity Trend: A Decomposition Analysis , 2008 .

[3]  D. Haralambopoulos,et al.  CO2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: A decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the Arithmetic Mean Divisia Index and Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index techniques , 2008 .

[4]  Fernando César Almada Santos,et al.  Environmental management in Brazil: Is it a completely competitive priority? , 2012 .

[5]  Jining Chen,et al.  Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957–2000 , 2005 .

[6]  Educational Policies and Economic Growth in BRICs: Comparative Perspectives , 2011 .

[7]  J. Sun Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model , 1998 .

[8]  Gürkan Kumbaroğlu,et al.  A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO 2 emissions over 19902007 , 2011 .

[9]  S. Paul,et al.  CO2 emission from energy use in India: a decomposition analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Elif Akbostancı,et al.  A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from energy use: Turkish case , 2009 .

[11]  Yongchen Song,et al.  Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission over 1991-2006 in China , 2009 .

[12]  Anatole Boute,et al.  RUSTEC: Greening Europe's Energy Supply by Developing Russia's Renewable Energy Potential , 2012 .

[13]  M. Greenstone,et al.  Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field , 2015 .

[14]  Shinji Kaneko,et al.  Driving forces behind the stagnancy of China's energy-related CO2 emissions from 1996 to 1999: The relative importance of structural change, intensity change and scale change , 2005 .

[15]  Anna Korppoo,et al.  Modernizing residential heating in Russia: End-use practices, legal developments and future prospects , 2012 .