Self-tuning decoupled information fusion Wiener state component filters and their convergence

For the multisensor systems with unknown noise variances, using the modern time series analysis method, based on on-line identification of the moving average (MA) innovation models, and based on the solution of the matrix equations for correlation function, the on-line estimators of the noise variances are obtained, and under linear minimum variance optimal information fusion criterion weighted by scalars for state components, a class of self-tuning decoupled fusion Wiener filters is presented. It realizes the self-tuning decoupled local Wiener filters and self-tuning decoupled fused Wiener filters for the state components. A new concept of convergence in a realization is presented, which is weaker than the convergence with probability one. The dynamic error system analysis (DESA) method is presented, by which the problem of convergence in a realization for self-tuning fusers is transformed into the stability problems of non-homogeneous difference equations, and the decision criterions of the stability are also presented. It is strictly proved that if the parameter estimation of the MA innovation models is consistent and if the measurement process is bounded in a realization or with probability one, then the self-tuning fusers will converge to the optimal fusers in a realization or with probability one, so that they have the asymptotic optimality. They can deal with the systems with the non-stationary or Gaussian measurement processes. They can reduce the computational burden, and are suitable for real time applications. A simulation example for a target tracking system with 3-sensor shows their effectiveness.

[1]  Shu-Li Sun,et al.  Multi-sensor optimal information fusion Kalman filter , 2004, Autom..

[2]  T. Moir,et al.  Optimal self-tuning filtering, prediction, and smoothing for discrete multivariable processes , 1984 .

[3]  Shu-Li Sun Multi-sensor information fusion white noise filter weighted by scalars based on Kalman predictor , 2004, Autom..

[4]  R. Mehra On the identification of variances and adaptive Kalman filtering , 1970 .

[5]  Zi-Li Deng,et al.  Descriptor Kalman estimators , 1999, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[6]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Linear Systems , 1980 .

[7]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Kalman Filtering with Real-time Applications , 1987 .

[8]  W. Rudin Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[9]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[10]  Yuan Gao,et al.  New approach to information fusion steady-state Kalman filtering , 2005, Autom..

[11]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal Filtering , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Zi-Li Deng Time-domain approaches to multichannel optimal deconvolution , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[13]  Michel Gevers,et al.  An innovations approach to the discrete-time stochastic realization problem , 1978 .

[14]  Michael J. Grimble,et al.  Dynamic ship positioning using a self-tuning Kalman filter , 1983 .

[15]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Kalman filtering: with real-time applications (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[16]  Zi-Li Deng,et al.  Optimal and self-tuning white noise estimators with applications to deconvolution and filtering problems , 1996, Autom..

[17]  Deng Zil Two-sensor Self-tuning Information Fusion Kalman Filter , 2003 .

[18]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  A First Course on Stochastic Processes , 1968 .

[19]  Yan Xu,et al.  Descriptor Wiener state estimators , 2000, Autom..

[20]  J. Kingman A FIRST COURSE IN STOCHASTIC PROCESSES , 1967 .

[21]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[22]  Per Hagander,et al.  A self-tuning filter for fixed-lag smoothing , 1977, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.