War President

The authors estimate a model of the job approval ratings of President George W. Bush that includes five sets of variables: a “honeymoon” effect, an autoregressive function that tracks a decline in approval, measures of economic performance, measures of important “rally events,” and a measure of the costs of war—in this case, the U.S. death toll in the Iraq War. Several significant effects are found, including the rally that followed the attacks of September 11, 2001; the commencement of the war in Iraq; and the capture of Baghdad in April 2003. Since the beginning of the war in Iraq, however, the casualties of war have had a significant negative impact on Bush’s approval ratings. Although the effects of additional battle deaths in Iraq will decrease approval only marginally, results suggest that there is also little prospect for sustained improvement so long as casualties continue to accumulate.

[1]  P. Robinson.  Gaussian Semiparametric Estimation of Long Range Dependence , 1995 .

[2]  Marc J. Hetherington,et al.  Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism , 2003, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[3]  Larry M. Bartels,et al.  Presidential Vote Models: A Recount , 2001, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[4]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods , 1998 .

[5]  M. Lewis-Beck,et al.  The Jobs Model Forecast: Well Done in 2004 , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[6]  Brian Lai,et al.  Rally ‘Round the Union Jack? Public Opinion and the Use of Force in the United Kingdom, 1948–2001 , 2005 .

[7]  Peter D. Feaver,et al.  Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force , 2003 .

[8]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support , 1991 .

[9]  James E. Campbell.  Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout , 2005 .

[10]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  The Macro Polity , 2001 .

[11]  Introduction—Assessments of the 2004 Presidential Vote Forecasts , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[12]  S. Kernell.  Explaining Presidential Popularity: How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One's Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of Anomalies , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Kj Love,et al.  A political analysis , 2003 .

[14]  E. Miguel,et al.  Iraq War Casualties and the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election , 2005 .

[15]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  Post-Election Reflections on Our Pre-Election Predictions , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[16]  Bruce W. Jentleson,et al.  The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force , 1992 .

[17]  Robert H. Durr.  What Moves Policy Sentiment? , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Richard C. Eichenberg.  Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force, 19812005 , 2005, International Security.

[19]  Paul Gronke,et al.  FDR to Clinton, Mueller to ?? A “State of the Discipline” Review of Presidential Approval , 2000 .

[20]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[21]  P. Brewer,et al.  Public Opinion, the War in Iraq, and Presidential Accountability , 2006 .

[22]  Jason Reifler,et al.  Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq , 2005, International Security.

[23]  J. Mueller,et al.  The Iraq Syndrome , 2005 .

[24]  Modelling memory and volatility: recent advances in the analysis of political time series. Editor's introduction , 2000 .

[25]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Fear in the Voting Booth: The 2004 Presidential Election , 2007 .

[26]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship , 1996, American Political Science Review.