A Comparison Between the Boston Brace and the Charleston Bending Brace in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design. The authors studied 319 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated at the same institution with either a Boston brace or a Charleston bending brace. Objectives. To determine if both orthoses are equally effective in stopping curve progression and preventing the need for surgical correction. Summary of Background Data. Early reports suggest that the Charleston brace may be comparable to the Boston brace in its effectiveness and that both braces positively influence the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Methods. Skeletally immature (Risser 0, 1, or 2) patients with idiopathic scoliosis who were 10 years old or older at the time of brace prescription, had curves from 25° to 45°, and had no prior treatment were studied retrospectively. All measurements were collected by a single observer, and all patients were followed up to skeletal maturity. Results. The Boston brace is more effective than the Charleston brace, both in preventing curve progression and in avoiding the need for surgery. These findings were most notable for patients with curves of 36°-45°, in whom 83% of the those treated with a Charleston brace had curve progression of more than 5°, compared with 43% of those treated with the Boston brace (p < 0.0001). Conclusion. When given the choice between these two orthoses in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the authors recommend use of the Boston brace. The Charleston brace should be considered only in the treatment of smaller single thoracolumbar or single lumbar curves.

[1]  H. Saraste,et al.  Boston brace in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. , 1995, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[2]  W. P. Bunnell,et al.  The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis Before Skeletal Maturity , 1986, Spine.

[3]  S. Weinstein Idiopathic Scoliosis: Natural History , 1986 .

[4]  R. Winter,et al.  Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the Milwaukee brace. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  A. Wozniak,et al.  Some Beneficial Effects of Bracing and a Search for Prognostic Indicators in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1986 .

[6]  H Labelle,et al.  Diurnal Variation of Cobb Angle Measurement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1993, Spine.

[7]  A B Schultz,et al.  Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis. A biomechanical analysis and a restrospective study. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  G. Macewen,et al.  The use of plastic jackets in the non-operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Preliminary report. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  E. Laurnen,et al.  The Boston Brace in Thoracic Scoliosis: A Preliminary Report , 1983, Spine.

[10]  A. Kaelin,et al.  The Boston Bracing System for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Follow-up Results in 295 Patients , 1986, Spine.

[11]  A. Schultz,et al.  Trunk Muscle Activities in Braced Scoliosis Patients , 1989, Spine.

[12]  D L Bader,et al.  The Biomechanical Effectiveness of the Boston Brace in the Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1989, Spine.

[13]  R. Winter,et al.  The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  O. Svensson,et al.  Long-term results of Boston brace treatment on vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. , 1993, Spine.

[15]  N. Green,et al.  Part-time bracing of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D. S. Scott,et al.  Nighttime Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with the Charleston Bending Brace: Preliminary Report , 1990, Spine.

[17]  T. Renshaw,et al.  Results of Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis with the Charleston Bending Orthosis , 1990, Spine.

[18]  A. Schultz,et al.  Effectiveness of braces in mild idiopathic scoliosis. , 1984, Spine.

[19]  M Poussa,et al.  Biological Factors and predictability of Bracing in Asolescent Idiopathic Scioliosis , 1989, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[20]  S Willner,et al.  Effect of the Boston thoracic brace on the frontal and sagittal curves of the spine. , 1984, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[21]  S. Willner,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively: an analysis of the clinical value of progression. , 1990, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[22]  R Vanderby,et al.  A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  H. Pettersson,et al.  Initial correction with the Boston Thoracic Brace. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[24]  H. Watts,et al.  The Boston brace system for the treatment of low thoracic and lumbar scoliosis by the use of a girdle without superstructure. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  J. M. Carlson,et al.  The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  B. Mouilleseaux,et al.  Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis in Girls and Boys , 1986, Spine.