Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies.

AIM Our purpose in this paper is to propose a new method for extracting findings from research reports included in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies. BACKGROUND International initiatives in the domains of systematic review and evidence synthesis have been focused on broadening the conceptualization of evidence, increased methodological inclusiveness and the production of evidence syntheses that will be accessible to and usable by a wider range of consumers. Initiatives in the general mixed-methods research field have been focused on developing truly integrative approaches to data analysis and interpretation. DATA SOURCE The data extraction challenges described here were encountered, and the method proposed for addressing these challenges was developed, in the first year of the ongoing (2011-2016) study: Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Research on Childhood Chronic Conditions and Family. DISCUSSION To preserve the text-in-context of findings in research reports, we describe a method whereby findings are transformed into portable statements that anchor results to relevant information about sample, source of information, time, comparative reference point, magnitude and significance and study-specific conceptions of phenomena. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING The data extraction method featured here was developed specifically to accommodate mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies conducted in nursing and other health sciences, but reviewers might find it useful in other kinds of research synthesis studies. CONCLUSION This data extraction method itself constitutes a type of integration to preserve the methodological context of findings when statements are read individually and in comparison to each other.

[1]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Mapping the Mixed Methods–Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain , 2012, Journal of mixed methods research.

[2]  H. Hiscock,et al.  Problem behaviours and parenting in preschool children with cystic fibrosis , 2009, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[3]  P. Svensson,et al.  Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data , 2011 .

[4]  D. Anthony Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective , 2007 .

[5]  G. Smilkstein,et al.  The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. , 1978, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  K. Hannes,et al.  Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach , 2012 .

[7]  D. Drotar,et al.  Sibling Relationships and Behavior After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury , 2003, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[8]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[9]  S. Harter The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. , 1982 .

[10]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[11]  A. Bryman Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[12]  D. Ellard,et al.  The psychosocial well-being of children with chronic disease, their parents and siblings: an overview of the research evidence base. , 2006, Child: care, health and development.

[13]  Jeffrey C. Valentine,et al.  Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  R. J. Thompson,et al.  Change in the Psychological Adjustment of Children with Cystic Fibrosis or Sickle Cell Disease and Their Mothers , 1999, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[15]  L. Belgrave,et al.  Negotiated Validity in Collaborative Ethnography , 1995 .

[16]  R. Conger,et al.  The Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales: Instrument summary. , 2000 .

[17]  M. Sandelowski Reading, writing and systematic review. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  S. Heriot,et al.  Parents of children with cystic fibrosis: how they hope, cope and despair. , 2008, Child: care, health and development.

[19]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research , 2006 .

[20]  D. Carr,et al.  Advances in Families and Health Research in the 21st Century , 2010 .

[21]  D. Drotar,et al.  Association of observed family relationship quality and problem-solving skills with treatment adherence in older children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. , 2004, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[22]  Trevor A Sheldon,et al.  Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[23]  D. Olson,et al.  Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. Theoretical update. , 1983, Family process.

[24]  M. MacLure,et al.  ‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: where’s the quality in systematic review? , 2005 .

[25]  S. Powers,et al.  Mealtime problems predict outcome in clinical trial to improve nutrition in children with CF , 2010, Pediatric pulmonology.

[26]  J. Ricker,et al.  Correlates of Regimen Adherence in Cystic Fibrosis , 1998, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[27]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to the Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Findings , 2012 .

[28]  D. Nicholas Meanings of Maternal Caregiving: Children with End Stage Renal Disease , 1999 .

[29]  K. Shojania,et al.  Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  J. Popay,et al.  Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods , 2007 .

[31]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Transforming Verbal Counts in Reports of Qualitative Descriptive Studies Into Numbers , 2009, Western journal of nursing research.

[32]  Andrea R Fleiszer,et al.  Empty systematic reviews: hidden perils and lessons learned. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  W. McMahon,et al.  Adherence and psychopathology in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis , 2009, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[34]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  On Quantitizing , 2009, Journal of mixed methods research.

[35]  J. Austin,et al.  Revision of the Family APGAR for use by 8-year-olds. , 1989 .