Creative Thought as Blind Variation and Selective Retention: Why Creativity is Inversely Related to Sightedness

Campbell (1960) proposed the theory that creativity required blind variation and selective retention (BVSR). More than a half century has transpired without any resolution of the controversy over the theory’s validity. This inability to reach consensus may reflect a fundamental failure on both sides to define the critical terms of the debate, namely, creativity and blindness. Hence, to help resolve the issue, the ideas making up a variant set are first described via three parameters: (a) the idea’s initial probability of generation, (b) its final utility, and (c) any prior knowledge of its utility value. These three subjective parameters are then used to derive a creativity index applicable to each idea in the set. The same parameters are also deployed to produce a sightedness metric that describes the sightedness of the variant set as well as each idea in that set. It is then logically demonstrated, first, that an idea’s creativity is inversely related to its sightedness, and, second, that an idea’s creativity is inversely related to the sightedness of the variant set that contains that idea. Furthermore, the same general conclusions hold when the third parameter is omitted from the two definitions or when the two definitions are not functions of identical parameters (e.g., novelty in one but originality in the other). Because blindness is just the inverse of sightedness, it automatically follows that creativity has an essential positive connection with blind variation. The article closes with a discussion of BVSR implications regarding the joint distribution of creativity and sightedness.

[1]  M. West,et al.  Innovation and creativity at work::Psychological and organizational strategies , 1992 .

[2]  Barry M. Staw An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. , 1990 .

[3]  D. Simonton Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[4]  S. Dasgupta Contesting (Simonton's) Blind Variation, Selective Retention Theory of Creativity , 2011 .

[5]  Chapter Four. Creativity As A Darwinian Phenomenon: The Blind-Variation Andselective-Retention Model , 2009 .

[6]  W. Beveridge The Art Of Scientific Investigation , 1957 .

[7]  L. Gabora An Analysis of the Blind Variation and Selective Retention Theory of Creativity , 2011, 1309.4692.

[8]  L. Andrews Relation of the , 2011 .

[9]  N. Maier Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. , 1931 .

[10]  D. Simonton Creativity and Discovery as Blind Variation and Selective Retention Multiple-Variant Definition and Blind-Sighted Integration , 2011 .

[11]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Investing in Creativity , 1993 .

[12]  M. Boden The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[13]  M. Kirton Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[14]  D. Simonton,et al.  From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. , 2011 .

[15]  William Stanley Jevons,et al.  The Principles of Science: A Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method , 2007 .

[16]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  The behavior mechanisms concerned with problem solving. , 1940 .

[17]  Ron Sun,et al.  Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: a unified theory and a connectionist model. , 2010, Psychological review.

[18]  D. Perkins In the Country of the Blind An Appreciation of Donald Campbell's Vision of Creative Thought , 1998 .

[19]  D. Simonton Creativity and Discovery as Blind Variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR Model after the Half-Century Mark , 2011 .

[20]  Maxwell J. Roberts,et al.  Integrating the mind : domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition , 2008 .

[21]  D. Campbell Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[22]  Henri Poincaré,et al.  The foundations of science , 2022 .

[23]  D. Simonton Creativity: Specialised expertise or general cognitive processes? , 2007 .

[24]  The relation of the scientific "hunch" to research , 1931 .

[25]  Edward W. Constant,et al.  On the Diversity and Co-Evolution of Technological Multiples , 1978 .

[26]  Evolutionary models of innovation and creativity , 2008 .

[27]  Cora L. Díaz Chumaceiro Serendipity or Pseudoserendipity? Unexpected versus Desired Results , 1995 .

[28]  S. Toulmin The collective use and evolution of concepts , 1972 .

[29]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Combinatorial Creativity and Sightedness: Monte Carlo Simulations Using Three-Criterion Definitions , 2012 .

[30]  D. Simonton,et al.  Psychology of Aesthetics , Creativity , and the Arts Foresight , Insight , Oversight , and Hindsight in Scientific Discovery : How Sighted Were Galileo ' s Telescopic Sightings ? , 2012 .

[31]  James D. Watson,et al.  The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA , 1968 .

[32]  G. Ferro-Luzzi On Evolutionary Epistemology , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[33]  Maria E. Kronfeldner,et al.  Darwinian ‘blind’ hypothesis formation revisited , 2010, Synthese.

[34]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Selection Theory and Social Construction: The Evolutionary Naturalistic Epistemology of Donald T. Campbell , 2001 .

[35]  E. S. Reese The Behavioral Mechanisms Underlying Shell Selection By Hermit Crabs1) , 1963 .

[36]  Ernst Mach,et al.  On the Part Played by Accident in Invention and Discovery. , 1896 .

[37]  Michael Flynn In the Country of the Blind , 1990 .

[38]  Paul Thagard,et al.  CREATIVE COMBINATION OF REPRESENTATIONS: SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY AND TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION , 2010 .

[39]  Joseph F. Miraglia An Evolutionary Approach to Revolutionary Change , 1994 .

[40]  D. Campbell Unjustified Variation and Selective Retention in Scientific Discovery , 1974 .

[41]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creativity, Problem Solving, and Solution Set Sightedness: Radically Reformulating BVSR , 2012 .

[42]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Cognitive Mechanisms in Human Creativity: Is Variation Blind or Sighted? , 1998 .

[43]  Larry Briskman,et al.  Creative Product And Creative Process In Science And Art , 1980 .

[44]  F. Wuketits The Philosophy of Donald T. Campbell: A Short Review and Critical Appraisal , 2001 .

[45]  P. Thagard,et al.  Computational Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[46]  W. Köhler The mentality of apes, 1917. , 1948 .

[47]  Colleen Seifert,et al.  Demystification of Cognitive Insight : Opportunistic Assimilation and the Prepared-Mind Perspective , 1995 .

[48]  Henri Poincaré,et al.  The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and Method , 2012 .

[49]  M. Runco,et al.  The Standard Definition of Creativity , 2012 .

[50]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[51]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research , 2004 .

[52]  P. Lipton,et al.  Where guesses come from: Evolutionary epistemology and the anomaly of guided variation , 1989 .

[53]  Yuval Ne'eman,et al.  Serendipity as a source of evolutionary progress in science , 1989 .

[54]  William James Great Men, Great Thoughts, and the Environment , 2009 .

[55]  Aharon Kantorovich,et al.  Scientific discovery : logic and tinkering , 1993 .

[56]  Larisa V. Shavinina The international handbook on innovation , 2003 .

[57]  A. Bain The senses and the intellect , 1998 .

[58]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  FEATURED ARTICLE: The Creative Process in Picasso's Guernica Sketches: Monotonic Improvements versus Nonmonotonic Variants , 2007 .

[59]  R. Swinburne,et al.  The Philosophy of Karl Popper , 1975 .

[60]  D. Simonton Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[61]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  On Structure in the Creative Process: A Quantitative Case-Study of the Creation of Picasso's Guernica , 2004 .

[62]  T. Nickles Evolutionary Models of Innovation and the Meno Problem , 2003 .

[63]  D. Dennett Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1995 .

[64]  L. Gabora Why blind-variation and selective-retention is an inappropriate explanatory framework for creativity: comment on "Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: combinatorial models of exceptional creativity" by Prof. Simonton. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[65]  D. Simonton Debating the BVSR Theory of Creativity: Comments on Dasgupta (2011) and Gabora (2011) , 2011 .

[66]  G. Regehr,et al.  Intuition in the context of discovery , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications , 2012 .

[68]  Gary A. Cziko,et al.  From Blind to Creative: In Defense of Donald Campbell's Selectionist Theory of Human Creativity , 1998 .

[69]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Models of Cultural Evolution , 1992 .

[70]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity , 2013 .

[71]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[72]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  An Evolutionary Approach , 2004 .