Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants

The effects of inter- and intraspecific interference on size hierarchies (size inequali- ties) were investigated in populations of the annual plants Trifolium incarnatum and Lolium multiflorum. Variables experimentally manipulated included plant density, species proportions, soil fertility, and spatial pattern of plantings. Densities were below those for extensive density-dependent mortality. Size inequality always increased with increasing density. Plants grown individually showed very low inequality, while plants grown at the highest density had the most developed hierarchies. Size inequality usually increased with an increase in productivity when interference was occurring. When dominant in mixtures, Lolium showed less size inequality than in monoculture, while the suppressed species, Trifolium, usually displayed an increase in inequality. Spatial pattern appeared to be less important than other factors in causing size inequalities; plants sown in a uniform spatial pattern showed significantly lower size inequality than plants sown in a random pattern in only one out of four cases. Inequality in reproductive output of Trifolium, as estimated by dry mass of flower heads, was always greater than inequality in plant dry mass. The results support a model of plant interference in which large plants are able to usurp resources and suppress the growth of smaller individuals more than they themselves are suppressed. While interference decreases mean plant mass, it increases both the relative variation in plant mass and the concentration of mass within a small fraction ofthe population.

[1]  The Basic Biology of Plant Numbers , 1979 .

[2]  D. R. Causton,et al.  The Biometry of Plant Growth , 1982 .

[3]  O. T. Solbrig,et al.  STUDIES ON THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE GENUS VIOLA. II. THE EFFECT OF PLANT SIZE ON FITNESS IN VIOLA SORORIA , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  J. White,et al.  CORRELATED CHANGES IN PLANT SIZE AND NUMBER IN PLANT POPULATIONS , 1970 .

[5]  D. Rabinowitz,et al.  Factors Affecting Frequency Distributions of Plant Mass: The Absence of Dominance and Suppression in Competing Monocultures of Festuca Paradoxa , 1983 .

[6]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Population Growth Rates and Age Versus Stage-Distribution Models for Teasel (Dipsacus Sylvestris Huds.) , 1977 .

[7]  A. Sen On Economic Inequality , 1974 .

[8]  P. Diaconis,et al.  Computer-Intensive Methods in Statistics , 1983 .

[9]  John L. Harper,et al.  OCCUPATION OF BIOLOGICAL SPACE DURING SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT , 1972 .

[10]  John L. Harper,et al.  INTERFERENCE IN DUNE ANNUALS: SPATIAL PATTERN AND NEIGHBOURHOOD EFFECTS , 1977 .

[11]  A. L. Koch,et al.  The logarithm in biology. 1. Mechanisms generating the log-normal distribution exactly. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  P. Marks,et al.  STAND STRUCTURE AND ALLOMETRY OF TREES DURING SELF-THINNING OF PURE STANDS , 1978 .

[13]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures , 1975 .

[14]  DEBORAH RABINOWITZ,et al.  Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv. , 1979, Nature.

[15]  J. Ogden Plant population structure and productivity. , 1970 .

[16]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[17]  J. Harper,et al.  Influence of Density on Plant Variation in Fiber Flax, Linum usitatissimum L. 1 , 1967 .

[18]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Competition for Light in a Plant Monoculture Modelled as a Spatial Stochastic Process , 1981 .

[19]  B. Efron Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods , 1981 .