Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination.

OBJECTIVE To compare ultrasonography (US) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), conventional radiography, and clinical examination in the evaluation of bone destruction and signs of inflammation in the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Two hundred MTP joints of 40 patients with RA and 100 MTP joints of 20 healthy control subjects were assessed with B-mode US, contrast-enhanced MRI, conventional radiography, and clinical examination for signs of bone destruction and joint inflammation. RESULTS With MRI considered the reference method, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US for the detection of bone erosions were 0.79, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively, while the corresponding values for radiography were 0.32, 0.98, and 0.93. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US for the detection of synovitis were 0.87, 0.74, and 0.79, while for clinical examination, the corresponding values were 0.43, 0.89, and 0.71. Erosive disease was identified in 26 patients by US, compared with 20 patients by MRI and 11 patients by radiography. Evaluation by US indicated signs of inflammation in 36 patients, while MRI and clinical examination revealed signs of inflammation in 31 patients and 20 patients, respectively. US and MRI volume-based gradings of synovitis showed intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.56-0.72 (P < 0.0001). The MRI and radiographic visualizations of US-detected bone changes were closely related to their size-based gradings on US. CONCLUSION US enables detection and grading of destructive and inflammatory changes in the MTP joints of patients with RA. By comparison with MRI, US was found to be markedly more sensitive and accurate than clinical examination and conventional radiography. Considering the early and frequent involvement of the MTP joints, evaluation of these joints by US may be of major clinical importance in RA.

[1]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  New radiographic bone erosions in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are detectable with magnetic resonance imaging a median of two years earlier. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  Neal Stewart,et al.  Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  G. Alarcón,et al.  High-resolution ultrasound for the study of target joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  U. Mödder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and miniarthroscopy of metacarpophalangeal joints: sensitive detection of morphologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  F. McQueen,et al.  What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using x rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of disease. , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  H. Bliddal,et al.  Quantitative ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of inflammation by Doppler technique , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  H. Genant,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: summary of OMERACT activities, current status, and plans. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[10]  W. Schmidt.  Value of sonography in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis , 2001, The Lancet.

[11]  John D. Isaacs,et al.  The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  The course of radiologic damage during the first six years of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  H. Tony,et al.  Evaluation of pannus and vascularization of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis by high-resolution ultrasound (multidimensional linear array). , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  P. Emery,et al.  The current status of ultrasonography in rheumatology. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[17]  F. McQueen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  N Stewart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[19]  D. Blake,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the rheumatoid synovial microvascular bed by gadolinium-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[20]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: comparison with the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the synovium. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Validity and reproducibility of self-administered joint counts. A prospective longitudinal followup study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  R. Adler,et al.  Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response--preliminary observations. , 1996, Radiology.

[23]  Koski Jm.  Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal and talocrural joints. , 1990 .

[24]  F. Arnett.  Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[25]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  P. Cook.  Roentgen Signs in Clinical Practice , 1966 .

[27]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Finger joint synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: quantitative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[28]  M. Lehto,et al.  Destruction and arthroplasties of the metatarsophalangeal joints in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. A 20-year follow-up study. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[29]  S. Lauritzen,et al.  Clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.